|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rob Kamm writes: |
I completely agree, and given my druthers (or an option like the naughty-pictures-or-not limiter) I'd keep the icon in line with the names and the size of a line of text, which on my machines means either small or medium. However, I'd imagine that some folks' mileage (er, pixelage) may vary, so allowing an option might be the way to go. But what do I know, I still do my CSS and HTML 4 on Wordpad and still have to keep a browser or two open to see what the heck I just did. |
Back to the Homepage
1,277 hits since 5 Aug 2004
©1994-2010 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
the original design | 8 | 3% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
the Small redesign | 41 | 16% | |
the Medium redesign | 93 | 36% | |
the Large redesign | 55 | 22% | |
redesign the logo | 19 | 7% | |
have a new contest | 20 | 8% | |
none of the other options | 9 | 4% | |
no opinion | 10 | 4% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
Back at the beginning of the year, a contest was announced to design a better Supporting Member logo. A winning logo was determined - but some felt that the logo was too large.
The following shrunken candidates have been received, and it is now your chance to once again determine which logo will be used at the website! | |
the original design |  |
|---|---|
the Small redesign | 
|
the Medium redesign | 
|
the Large redesign | 
|
redesign the logo | This isn't working - just shrinking the logo isn't enough. Use the basic concept of the logo, but move elements around and reduce it in height. |
have a new contest | This isn't working - we should have a new logo-design contest. |
none of the other options | I favor some option that's not in the poll. |
no opinion | I don't have an opinion. |
