POLL: Worst Historical Wargame Rules (Round 1)

"Broadsword, Buccaneer, and Blunderbuss" (Pirate Rules by Old Glory)…

Completely unplayable not to the difficulty of the rules but to the sections that are completely missing from the rules book…

Among many of the problems were:

1: The author of the book knew what he was writing about but seemed to not understand the concept that the reader may need or want definitions of some of the terms he used.

2: Whole entire paragraphs of text missing from the book.

3: The wrong maps used in the scenarios.

4: Lack of proof reading and editing, thus horrible misspellings throughout.

TBH, it looked like
A: Either the author just cranked these out in a 2 day drunk and tossed them to the printer,
or
B: He dropped the rough draft onto the editors desk while the editor was at lunch, and the printer came by and saw them and thought it was the final for print, and took it,
or
C: He missed the deadline and the editor came screaming to him saying "We need it NOW!", and he just gave them what he had and editor said "Fine! RUN IT"

It's absolutely horrible and a perfect example of "How rules shouldn't be written and published".