|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Green Pelican  writes: |
Here's a reason : Your historical game may publish a new edition of the rules, but they won't insist that you buy the new figures that come with it if you want to engage in ‘official tournament play'. |
Back to the Homepage
Rating: 
Editor in Chief Bill 
looks for scenario material in a World War IV boardgame.
321 hits since 2 Sep 2024
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
historical models are beautiful too | 23 | 8% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
historical games offer tournaments/competition too | 6 | 2% | |
history is the ultimate lore | 27 | 9% | |
historical models are less expensive | 26 | 9% | |
you can't copyright history | 32 | 11% | |
historicals do not suffer from power creep | 26 | 9% | |
rules and minis are typically sold by different companies | 25 | 8% | |
scenario-oriented play makes better games | 11 | 4% | |
historicals are fun too | 28 | 9% | |
40K and historicals aren't different hobbies | 27 | 9% | |
historicals aren't dominated by franchise gaming | 39 | 13% | |
all of the above | 15 | 5% | |
none of these/no opinion | 4 | 1% | |
this is ridiculous | 4 | 1% | |
not my genre | 2 | 1% | |
not my cup of tea | 1 | 0% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
Poll suggestion by DisasterWargamer Poll set up by |
