|
The Membership System is temporarily offline for maintenance. It should be restored shortly. If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS |
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
yes, but don't be negative | 147 | 37% |  |
|---|
yes, but it's not polite | 90 | 23% | |
|---|
no | 41 | 10% | |
|---|
yes | 56 | 14% | |
|---|
no - don't mention competitors by name | 61 | 15% | |
|---|
| POLL DESCRIPTION |
What should the ground rules be, when one miniature company is promoting a line of figures which are competitive with another company's figures? Is it OK for Company A to state in its advertisements that its figures are "superior" to Company B? |
yes, but don't be negative | It's OK as long as Company A concentrates on the features of their product, and doesn't run down Company B's product. |
|---|
yes, but it's not polite | There's nothing illegal about it, but it shows a lack of professionalism on the part of Company A. |
|---|
no | It's wrong for an advertiser to mention the competition in any way, even indirectly. |
|---|
yes | Sure, why not? As a consumer, I want to know which figures are the best. |
|---|
no - don't mention competitors by name | It's wrong for an advertiser to mention specific competitors in their advertisements, but they can make indirect references to other companies. |
|---|
|
