Help support TMP


POLL: Spotting in WWII: Probabilistic or Deterministic?


77 votes were cast.


Back to POLLS home page


Personal logo The Nigerian Lead Minister Supporting Member of TMP writes:

Is it too many die rolls? Depends on what else is going on in the game.


Back to the Homepage


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Crossfire


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Memoir '44 Painted U.S. Infantry

Ever wondered how the 'toy soldiers' look when painted?


Featured Profile Article

Playing the Kokoda Track

On the Kokoda Track at Council of Five Nations.


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


303 hits since 7 Nov 2024
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?

VOTING RESULTS
AnswerVotes%Chart
not my genre
3
4%
bar of chart
none of these/no opinion
11
14%
bar of chart
prefer deterministic spotting rules
25
32%
bar of chart
other (explain)
1
1%
bar of chart
not my cup of tea
0
0%
 
prefer probabilistic spotting rules
36
47%
bar of chart
this is ridiculous
1
1%
bar of chart
POLL IS CLOSED
POLL DESCRIPTION

Fred Cartwright Supporting Member of TMP writes:

Interested in preferences for spotting rules in WWII sets. Do you prefer probabilistic spotting rules where you roll dice or some other random generator to spot units within a defined range band, or a deterministic system where you spot infantry in cover at up to xx range and beyond that range they remain unspotted? Do you think the extra "realism"/fog of war/uncertainty of the probabilistic model is worth the extra complexity?

Poll set up by Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian, based on this pre-poll discussion.