|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| unknown member writes: |
Is it too many die rolls? Depends on what else is going on in the game. |
Back to the Homepage
unknown member explains a simple, quick, and effective way to base troops for Flames of War.
unknown member looks at some new terrain products, which use space age technology!
288 hits since 7 Nov 2024
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
The Membership System is temporarily offline for maintenance. It should be restored shortly.
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
this is ridiculous | 1 | 1% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
not my cup of tea | 0 | 0% | |
not my genre | 3 | 4% | |
none of these/no opinion | 11 | 14% | |
other (explain) | 1 | 1% | |
prefer probabilistic spotting rules | 36 | 47% | |
prefer deterministic spotting rules | 25 | 32% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
unknown member writes: Interested in preferences for spotting rules in WWII sets. Do you prefer probabilistic spotting rules where you roll dice or some other random generator to spot units within a defined range band, or a deterministic system where you spot infantry in cover at up to xx range and beyond that range they remain unspotted? Do you think the extra "realism"/fog of war/uncertainty of the probabilistic model is worth the extra complexity? Poll set up by unknown member, based on this pre-poll discussion. |
