POLL: Spotting in WWII: Probabilistic or Deterministic?

The last day of voting is 13 Nov 2024.

Frederick

writes:

Deterministic with the caveat that things like moving AFVs who are firing are pretty easy to spot so the rules need to recognize/address this

Back to the Homepage

Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article

Soviet 122mm Howitzer Available

Featured Recent Link

Connections UK 2019 Fire-Move Game 2

Featured Ruleset

Hell on Wheels

Rating:

Featured Profile Article

First Look: GF9's 1:100 Train Yard Switching Tower

Editor in Chief Bill adds a tower to his 15mm trainyard.

Current Poll

Spotting in WWII: Probabilistic or Deterministic?

Featured Book Review

COMBAT: British Paratrooper VERSUS Fallschirmjäger

If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?

POLL DESCRIPTION

Fred Cartwright writes:

Interested in preferences for spotting rules in WWII sets. Do you prefer probabilistic spotting rules where you roll dice or some other random generator to spot units within a defined range band, or a deterministic system where you spot infantry in cover at up to xx range and beyond that range they remain unspotted? Do you think the extra "realism"/fog of war/uncertainty of the probabilistic model is worth the extra complexity?

Poll set up by Editor in Chief Bill , based on this pre-poll discussion.