|
The Membership System is temporarily offline for maintenance. It should be restored shortly. If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS |
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
Flames of War | 9 | 12% |  |
|---|
not my genre | 10 | 13% | |
|---|
Rapid Fire | 8 | 10% | |
|---|
Crossfire | 10 | 13% | |
|---|
this is ridiculous | 0 | 0% | |
|---|
not my cup of tea | 5 | 6% | |
|---|
Chain of Command | 9 | 12% | |
|---|
all of these rules | 1 | 1% | |
|---|
none of these/no opinion | 18 | 23% | |
|---|
Battlefront: WWII | 4 | 5% | |
|---|
I Ain't Been Shot, Mum! | 3 | 4% | |
|---|
| POLL DESCRIPTION |
unknown member writes:
I am looking for a rulesystem to regame the War in the Pacific. I am quite familiar with FoW V1 and 2, but I dislike V4. Would Battlegroup be a fitting alternative?
I want to do those land battles as a part of a campaign, where the strategic level is played with the boardgame Orange Swan, naval battles would be played with Naval Thunder, and the rule system for land battles is the topic of this thread. Are there any other 15mm systems that comes to mind?
Poll set up by unknown member, based on this previous poll. |
|
