POLL: Should TMP Issue Bad Trader Alerts?
647 votes were cast.
Back to POLLS home page
Back to the Homepage
|
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS |
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
yes, with limits | 141 | 22% |  |
|---|
no - too much power | 5 | 1% | |
|---|
yes, with commission | 32 | 5% | |
|---|
no - other | 1 | 0% | |
|---|
yes | 353 | 55% | |
|---|
yes, with vote | 31 | 5% | |
|---|
no - too much controversy | 2 | 0% | |
|---|
no - not TMP's mission | 15 | 2% | |
|---|
no - leave it to the boards | 67 | 10% | |
|---|
| POLL DESCRIPTION |
Last week, TMP issued a Bad Trader Alert (a consumer warning) on Crusader29. There's been a lot of discussion about that, so it seems time to ask the question...
Should TMP issue Bad Trader Alerts? |
yes, with limits | TMP should continue to issue Bad Trader Alerts when warranted, but situations which involve conflicts of interest (i.e., bad debts to TMP) should be subject to outside review.
|
|---|
no - too much power | Bad Trader Alerts from TMP risk putting too much power in the hands of a single website/webmaster.
|
|---|
yes, with commission | TMP should continue to issue Bad Trader Alerts, but there should be some kind of TMP commission or committee that advises the Editor.
|
|---|
no - other | TMP should not issue Bad Trader Alerts.
|
|---|
yes | TMP should continue to issue Bad Trader Alerts when warranted.
|
|---|
yes, with vote | TMP should continue to issue Bad Trader Alerts, but there should first be a poll to see if the members support it.
|
|---|
no - too much controversy | Issuing Bad Trader Alerts causes too much acrimony, and makes the website less enjoyable.
|
|---|
no - not TMP's mission | TMP's mission should not include policing the gaming industry.
|
|---|
no - leave it to the boards | There is no need for a Bad Trader Alert. Just let people post complaints on the Consumer Affairs board and leave it at that.
|
|---|
|
