|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| dejvid writes: |
The problem is that WRG basing requires rule writers cater for a intermediate troop type despite the evidence being dubious at best. Daivid |
Back to the Homepage
601 hits since 24 Oct 2009
©1994-2009 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
yes - there's a problem | 25 | 14% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
no - there's no problem | 15 | 9% | |
not a FoG player | 117 | 68% | |
abstain | 16 | 9% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
Writing in Slingshot magazine, Christopher Webber opines: Like most other rules, Field of Glory simulates heavy and light infantry reasonably well but has trouble simulating intermediate troop types, in particular peltasts. Do you agree? |
