|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It isn't the lack of figures available in any given scale. I will second what Fredrick said – it is really hard to hand one player the Egyptians/Syrians and tell him he needs to remove his frotal lobe before he takes command. You can't game stupidity and if it is a game with a referee, the ref feels like he has it out for the Egyptian/Syrian forces because NO tabletop gamer could blunder as badly as the actual commanders given the tabletop look down view that gamers have. It's like trying to actually command a Prussian assault against a numerically superior Austrian or French opponent who does not have significant constraints on his command and control of his troops – you can't game the stupidity of some generals. |
Back to the Homepage
641 hits since 16 Dec 2007
©1994-2010 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
yes | 19 | 19% | |
|---|---|---|---|
no | 57 | 57% | |
no opinion | 24 | 24% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
Writing in the June 2007 issue of Wargames, Soldiers & Strategy, Antonio Carrasco wrote: It's funny how the Arab-Israeli Wars, one of the longest and most playable conflicts in recent history, are not more popular among gamers. Perhaps the problem is that there isn't a wide selection of quality figures on the market. Do you agree? |