Help support TMP


POLL: Should Spamming Via PM Result in Banishment?


330 votes were cast.


Back to POLLS home page


unknown member writes:

First offense is a warning.

Second offense is Dawghouse.

Third offense is a suspension of PMing privileges(maybe for certain amount of time).

More than that and it shows a continued effort by the PMer to continually send Spam and the offender should have his account locked.


Back to the Homepage



1,472 hits since 17 Jan 2012
©1994-2017 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

The Membership System is temporarily offline for maintenance. It should be restored shortly.

If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?

VOTING RESULTS
AnswerVotes%Chart
a warning should be given
109
33%
bar of chart
heck, yeah!
74
22%
bar of chart
Beat the perp like a pinata!
36
11%
bar of chart
just hit the delete key and carry on
30
9%
bar of chart
no opinion
19
6%
bar of chart
Lock him in the Dawghouse
53
16%
bar of chart
other (explain)
4
1%
bar of chart
what's a PM?
4
1%
bar of chart
no, it is a legitimate practice
1
0%
bar of chart
POLL IS CLOSED
POLL DESCRIPTION

unknown member writes:

Should spamming TMP PMs be punishable by banning? Prompted by this discussion.

(Options taken from this pre-poll discussion.)