|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stagger Lee  writes: |
First offense is a warning. Second offense is Dawghouse. Third offense is a suspension of PMing privileges(maybe for certain amount of time). More than that and it shows a continued effort by the PMer to continually send Spam and the offender should have his account locked. |
Back to the Homepage
1,525 hits since 17 Jan 2012
©1994-2018 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
what's a PM? | 4 | 1% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
no, it is a legitimate practice | 1 | 0% | |
other (explain) | 4 | 1% | |
just hit the delete key and carry on | 30 | 9% | |
Beat the perp like a pinata! | 36 | 11% | |
Lock him in the Dawghouse | 53 | 16% | |
a warning should be given | 109 | 33% | |
heck, yeah! | 74 | 22% | |
no opinion | 19 | 6% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
CPT Jake Should spamming TMP PMs be punishable by banning? Prompted by this discussion. (Options taken from this pre-poll discussion.) |
