Help support TMP


POLL: Should Spamming Via PM Result in Banishment?


330 votes were cast.


Back to POLLS home page


Stagger Lee writes:

First offense is a warning.

Second offense is Dawghouse.

Third offense is a suspension of PMing privileges(maybe for certain amount of time).

More than that and it shows a continued effort by the PMer to continually send Spam and the offender should have his account locked.


Back to the Homepage



Areas of Interest

General

1,710 hits since 17 Jan 2012
©1994-2019 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?

VOTING RESULTS
AnswerVotes%Chart
other (explain)
4
1%
bar of chart
what's a PM?
4
1%
bar of chart
a warning should be given
109
33%
bar of chart
Beat the perp like a pinata!
36
11%
bar of chart
no, it is a legitimate practice
1
0%
bar of chart
just hit the delete key and carry on
30
9%
bar of chart
heck, yeah!
74
22%
bar of chart
Lock him in the Dawghouse
53
16%
bar of chart
no opinion
19
6%
bar of chart
POLL IS CLOSED
POLL DESCRIPTION

CPT Jake writes:

Should spamming TMP PMs be punishable by banning? Prompted by this discussion.

(Options taken from this pre-poll discussion.)