|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 John the OFM  writes: |
Heck. I always "tweak" any and all rules, because I know better than they do. |
Back to the Homepage
A happy customer writes to tell us about a painting service...
Editor in Chief Bill 
wants to know if you can tell the difference between weaker and stronger magnets with 3mm aircraft.
409 hits since 2 Oct 2025
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
none of these/no opinion | 1 | 1% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
yes, rules have a natural lifespan | 15 | 16% | |
no, rules do not have a natural lifespan | 73 | 78% | |
this is ridiculous | 1 | 1% | |
not my cup of tea | 0 | 0% | |
other (explain) | 3 | 3% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
robert piepenbrink I've played and still play 60+ year old rules if they're suitable to troops and period, and I don't have any problem with them. But I've seen wargamers reject 10-15-year-old rules as hopelessly old-fashioned. Do rules have a "natural" or "normal" lifespan? Is there a period after which they become "vintage" instead of just "tested?" And does this vary with type of combat (land, sea, air) or type of play (tournament, club small circle of friends)? Poll set up by |
