Help support TMP


POLL: Are Your Underthings Showing?


90 votes were cast.


Back to POLLS home page


von Schwartz ver 2 writes:

Who says I'm wearing anything underneath?


Back to the Homepage


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Workbench Article

Drilling Holes in Minis - Part I

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian experiments with Finger Drills.


Featured Profile Article

Cobblestone Corners Christmas Trees

Christmas trees for your gaming table.


398 hits since 10 Oct 2021
©1994-2021 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.

If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?

VOTING RESULTS
AnswerVotes%Chart
other (explain)
1
1%
bar of chart
I paint the underparts the same as the rest of the figure
27
30%
bar of chart
none of these/no opinion
2
2%
bar of chart
this is ridiculous
2
2%
bar of chart
not my cup of tea
0
0%
 
I put less effort into painting the underparts
48
53%
bar of chart
I don't paint the underparts
10
11%
bar of chart
POLL IS CLOSED
POLL DESCRIPTION

Personal logo etotheipi Sponsoring Member of TMP writes:

Specifically with respect to painting your minis and how much effort you put on undersides of models.

Do you just slap some base color underneath and leave it at that? Maybe make the underside a shade darker, but no more effort? Or are the undersides just as detailed as the part everyone sees?

I generally try to shade with lighter colors on top and darker ones underneath, but I still do not put significant effort into the true underside of a mini. Stuff like the bottom of a tunic where you would have to flip over the mini and twist the angle to catch a glimpse (for… reasons?) or the undercarriage of a car or jeep.

Poll set up by Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian, based on this pre-poll discussion.