Help support TMP


POLL: ECW Royalists & Archeology


118 votes were cast.


Back to POLLS home page


Rallynow Supporting Member of TMP writes:

For some reason the choice "this is not relevant to my ECW games" is not showing in the drop down selection to vote on.


Back to the Homepage



847 hits since 18 May 2016
©1994-2017 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?

VOTING RESULTS
AnswerVotes%Chart
no opinion
6
5%
bar of chart
I don't play ECW
56
47%
bar of chart
no, my Royalists are not undermanned and over-staffed
17
14%
bar of chart
yes, my Royalists are undermanned and over-staffed
6
5%
bar of chart
this is not relevant to my ECW games
32
27%
bar of chart
other (explain)
1
1%
bar of chart
POLL IS CLOSED
POLL DESCRIPTION
Writing in Miniature Wargames magazine back in 2005, archeologist Anthony Dawson reported that evidence supports the view that Royalist companies in 1644-45 were frequently smaller than regulation, but overstaffed with officers and NCOs. Do your Royalist units reflect this?

Poll set up by Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian, based on this pre-poll discussion.