|
Whirlwind writes: |
It is quite good in that it focuses on playing all of the big Ancient battles with a maximum of 20-units a side or so which can be handy as some of the really big Ancients-era encounters were huge. |
Back to the Homepage
378 hits since 14 Apr 2024
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
VOTING RESULTS | |||
Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
I've never heard of Lost Battles | 69 | 72% | |
---|---|---|---|
I've never played Lost Battles | 13 | 14% | |
I don't play Lost Battles any more | 1 | 1% | |
other (explain) | 0 | 0% | |
not my genre | 0 | 0% | |
I have played Lost Battles at least once | 1 | 1% | |
I own Lost Battles but haven't played it yet | 7 | 7% | |
not my cup of tea | 0 | 0% | |
I want to play Lost Battles but can't find opponents | 0 | 0% | |
I play Lost Battles from time to time | 3 | 3% | |
Lost Battles is my main Ancients ruleset | 0 | 0% | |
Lost Battles is one of my favorite Ancients rulesets | 1 | 1% | |
this is ridiculous | 0 | 0% | |
none of these/no opinion | 1 | 1% | |
I plan to buy Lost Battles | 0 | 0% |
POLL IS CLOSED |
POLL DESCRIPTION | |
Do you play Lost Battles, Phil Sabin's ruleset that claims to combine "academic rigor with the interest and accessibility of simulation gaming"? (A battle report was featured in Slingshot issue 344.) Poll set up by Editor in Chief Bill , based on this pre-poll discussion. |