"First tweet from modern humans" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Science Plus Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset Rating:
Featured Showcase ArticleSometimes at a convention, you can be just dead lucky and find a real bargain.
Featured Workbench ArticleWill "embedding" improve the treebases?
Featured Profile Article
|
Gunfreak | 12 Sep 2018 12:44 p.m. PST |
Norwegian archeologists from University of Bergen has found 73 000 year old markings in South Africa. Oldest known from modern humans. |
Andrew Walters | 12 Sep 2018 4:39 p.m. PST |
National Geographic, among others, seems to be asking questions… link I'm always concerned when a single sample like this is going to drastically increase the range of data points. If we're going to re-write that much we need solid footing. This is essentially twice as old as anything else, and it's single item. Maybe there was one Einstein in the bunch, she had a good day, she made some things, and then nothing else happened for 30,000 years. So mankind didn't start drawing 73,000 years ago, one individual way out on the right end of the bell curve did a thing. On the other hand, if it's a one off the odds that we would find it are infinitesimal, and it doesn't seem like a first effort. I greatly look forward to more discoveries. |
Gunfreak | 13 Sep 2018 2:27 a.m. PST |
While I agree with that, They do have "writing" from over 500k years ago by Homo Erectus on Java, so I assume it wasn't very uncommon. I did react to the Norwegian article about the 73k "writing" that said the writing done on the clams shell 500k years ago was done by humans "older and far simpler ancestor" I don't agree that homo erectus was "far simpler" I think there was a tiny tiny difference between us, yes tiny differences can have huge effects, but I don't think "far simpler" is a correct description of homo erectus. |
Bowman | 13 Sep 2018 5:41 a.m. PST |
I agree with Andrew. More work needs to be done. I'm not even sure that this couldn't be the result of a a non-human or even a natural process. |
|