Help support TMP


"Two eminent climate scientists discuss the ...." Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Science Plus Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

MEST


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

The 4' x 6' Assault Table Top

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian begins to think about terrain for Team Yankee.


Featured Profile Article

Living in China in the Time of Pneumonia

How is a China-based wargaming company getting by in the time of coronavirus?


302 hits since 6 Apr 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0106 Apr 2017 3:45 p.m. PST

… policy debate. Their clash tells us much.

"Summary: The climate policy debate heats up, as seen in this exchange between two climate scientists sparked by last week's House hearing about climate change. It illuminates the areas of agreement and debate among scientists, which is an important aspect of the policy debate — but seldom mentioned by journalists…"
Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

Martin From Canada06 Apr 2017 5:11 p.m. PST

I wouldn't call the second one "eminent"…

Cacique Caribe06 Apr 2017 8:26 p.m. PST

You guys keep confusing me. I thought Science was Science and that there was no discussion about it.

Dan

GarrisonMiniatures07 Apr 2017 1:16 a.m. PST

Science is science and should always involve discussion. In science, you observe and test. Without discussion, interpretation tends to be awkward sometimes.

Bowman07 Apr 2017 5:20 a.m. PST

Fabius Maximus, "Helping to re-ignite the spirit of a nation grown cold."

Sheesh.

It's hardly an even handed exposition of the two viewpoints either. But more importantly, it is hardly an "exchange between two climate scientists", Seiter vs Pielke. It would be more accurate to say its a difference of opinion between Pielke and the entire AMS.

You guys keep confusing me.

Dan, you don't need our help.

Cacique Caribe07 Apr 2017 1:03 p.m. PST

Lol. Then stop adding to my already confused state.

Dan

GarrisonMiniatures11 Apr 2017 3:24 a.m. PST

I'd say that the confusion is due to the politics of the debate rather than the science of the debate. Confusion always seems to be one of the main results of politics – too many 'alternative truths' in politics, in science very few things are considered 'true' until they have been proved!

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.