| Tango01 | 05 Dec 2016 1:07 p.m. PST |
Well… Main page
link Amicalement
Armand |
| Martin From Canada | 05 Dec 2016 1:58 p.m. PST |
|
| zoneofcontrol | 05 Dec 2016 2:05 p.m. PST |
The assumption is that the UFO is feeding off the sun. What if the opposite is true? What if that UFO is recharging the sun for the next warming cycle? |
| Col Durnford | 05 Dec 2016 2:11 p.m. PST |
Martin, What, no charts? :) |
 Editor in Chief Bill   | 05 Dec 2016 2:31 p.m. PST |
spark?
intergalactic garbage truck? |
| Who asked this joker | 05 Dec 2016 2:41 p.m. PST |
Has anyone debunked it yet? Certainly someone took the time to put in all the cgi stuff at the beginning making it less…well…credible. |
| Charlie 12 | 05 Dec 2016 10:30 p.m. PST |
If you enjoy baseless conspiracy theories run amok, then the website Armand linked to is just your cup tea…. For the rest of us with functioning grey matter, not so much… |
| Prince Rupert of the Rhine | 06 Dec 2016 2:37 a.m. PST |
|
| Great War Ace | 06 Dec 2016 7:36 a.m. PST |
Positing an artifact is the most likely explanation. I read the thread. The object pops into view. The view is repeated. "Did you see that?" No movement, just a sudden flash, there it is. What happens in the next instant? We don't see that. I'm assuming that it disappears as quickly as it appeared. So, an artifact. |
| Bowman | 06 Dec 2016 9:00 a.m. PST |
From a comment of the article: I was disappointed that I didn't see the silhouettes of Crow, Tom Servo, and Joel (or Mike) sitting down in their theater seats……. Exactly. |
| Bowman | 06 Dec 2016 9:01 a.m. PST |
Nice to see us having some common ground, GWA. |
