Help support TMP


"The Physics of an AT-AT falling..." Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Science Plus Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

The Amazing Worlds of Grenadier

The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.


Featured Workbench Article

A Good-Looking Army in a Reasonable Amount of Time

Painting a wargaming army is a completely different beast from painting a single miniature for display.


Featured Profile Article

Charge, Thunder & Steel!

Creating a hobby music video, using AI and a clip app.


623 hits since 7 May 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

richarDISNEY07 May 2013 1:26 p.m. PST

Ahhh… science!
link
The funny thing is that I was able to follow the whole article.
beer

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP07 May 2013 2:51 p.m. PST

Okay, I'll admit to being math-challenged on this (which is why I pursued writing rather than science or engineering— I get the theory of science very well, but the math part leaves my head spinning). But I still got the gist of his point, and am amused that he actually tried to calculate this.

But I think I know why his calculations result in falling times that don't match between Luke and the AT-AT and Hoth's assumed gravitational equivalent to Earth. And that's simply because what was filmed falling was a scale model with an actual height of (I'm guessing) less than a meter. Less height, less time to fall.

But that's unsatisfactory for our imagined premise that this is a *real* AT-AT on a real planet, with a height of 22 meters (give or take).

Now, we could possibly suggest that the reason the AT-AT falls "faster" than it should might be because the blast imparted an additional initial momentum to the fall that makes up the one second difference.

Or maybe Luke just wanted it to fall faster, and with his poor Force control, the fall velocity increased without his being aware of causing it.
Yeah, that'll work.

SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER07 May 2013 9:54 p.m. PST

meh. We call this mental Bleeped text.

Jakse37507 May 2013 10:22 p.m. PST

He didn't account for wind velocity or direction which could easily explain the increased speed of the fall of an object using the pendulum movement vs the direct fall of skywalker where the same wind would only displace his landing and not affect his fall speed.

Streitax08 May 2013 11:27 a.m. PST

Toooooo muuuuuuuch tiiiiiiiiime.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.