Help support TMP


"Chelyabinskl meteor on the same trajectory as 1912DA14?" Topic


21 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Science Plus Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Workbench Article

Forest Bases on a Budget

Holy Roman Emperor Joseph III Fezian shows us that you don't need money to have great bases.


Featured Profile Article

Report from Gamex 2005

Our Man in Southern California, Wyatt the Odd, reports on the Gamex 2005 convention.


Featured Book Review


804 hits since 16 Feb 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP16 Feb 2013 7:44 a.m. PST

Or is it just an AMAZING coincidence?

x42brown16 Feb 2013 8:02 a.m. PST

Ranging shots.

x42

Patrick R16 Feb 2013 8:04 a.m. PST

2012DA14 went south to north, while the Chelyabinsk meteor went from east to west (or NE to SW) as was inferred by the position of the sun in the various videos.

The coincidence is that the two arrived at such a short interval.

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP16 Feb 2013 8:05 a.m. PST

I don't know which is scarier. Both being on the same trajectory, or coming in from opposite directions. grin

Gunfreak16 Feb 2013 8:23 a.m. PST

"I don't know which is scarier. Both being on the same trajectory, or coming in from opposite directions. "

Bugs to the right of us, bugs to the left of us.

Great War Ace16 Feb 2013 9:13 a.m. PST

We're talking about matching trajectories, when the same dammed thing happens IN THE SAME PLACE that close together time-wise. What is it about Russia that attracts these things?…

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP16 Feb 2013 9:54 a.m. PST

What is it about Russia that attracts these things?…

It's the hats.

But seriously, it's just that Russia is so frickin' BIG. Proportionally, no area of Russia gets any more meteor strikes than any other area of the world— Russia just has a lot more "area" in their area.

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP16 Feb 2013 10:54 a.m. PST

Why did I type 1912?

Garand16 Feb 2013 11:06 a.m. PST

Read a Russian politician make the claim it was actually a US weapons test, not a meteor, directed at intimidating the great Russian people…

Damon :)

Gunfreak16 Feb 2013 11:13 a.m. PST

Yes it is an american attack, obama made a deal with the bugs if the bugs send the astroid obama will give the bugs Utah.

On a diffrent note, the main explotion was mabye sevral hundred kilotons, compear that to little boy that was only about 15kt, just imagien if it had hit the ground instead of going up in the atmosfare, what if it had hit Berlin, Tokyo New York ect. sevral million people would die.

skippy000116 Feb 2013 12:54 p.m. PST

It's the Klendathu re-enactment of the Ploesti Raid.

Or N. Korea's DeathStar Drone.

Sparker16 Feb 2013 1:58 p.m. PST

Why did I type 1912?

Probably because its been postulated that there was mahoosive meteor strike in Russia around that time…I think the boffins postulated early decades of the 20thC from the age of the trees that started growing straight again…a very remote area, no-one saw it, but it was inferred from the shape of a particular lake and the fallen trees around it….the name of the area escapes me now – but you can definately see the path of a big detonation traced out in tree fall from imagery…

Dan Wideman II16 Feb 2013 3:06 p.m. PST

Tunguska?

kyoteblue16 Feb 2013 3:08 p.m. PST

Looks like we dodged the bullet again.

Patrick R16 Feb 2013 3:29 p.m. PST

1908

link

They think Tunguska was about 100m, which is about ten times the size of this one, which sounds about right, 10m knocks out windows in a city, 100m knocks down trees and buildings.

There was another similar incident in Brazil in 1930.

link

If the next one respects the law of averages we should get another one in about 100 years, though one could strike tomorrow, the chance of one rock striking doesn't affect the chances of a second one from striking at all.

And here is a list of recent events.

link

Sparker16 Feb 2013 10:54 p.m. PST

Tunguska – Thats the badger! Thanks!

Ron W DuBray17 Feb 2013 9:43 a.m. PST

There was one in way up state NY back in winter 97 98 that lit up the whole half of the state. I was out side and jump in the ditch at the flash and the boom almost made me sh!! my pants. It was about 20 mins before the news got to the radio and the whole time I was thinking we got nuked.

Ron W DuBray17 Feb 2013 9:50 a.m. PST

trajectory has nothing to do with east or west. east or west will only let you know what side of the earth it missed on.

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP17 Feb 2013 11:09 a.m. PST

Duck! The aliens have switched to full auto! link

Gunfreak18 Feb 2013 2:45 p.m. PST

They now say the explotion was about 500kt, that more powerfull the most current nuklear weapons

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP19 Feb 2013 5:13 p.m. PST

They now say the explotion was about 500kt, that more powerfull the most current nuklear weapons

In a single warhead in active arsenals, yes (AFAWK). But for the bulk of the Cold War period, not even close. Yields of 1.5mt, 5mt, and 25mt were all in the US and/or Soviet arsenals, and yields up to 50mt were built and tested (the Tsar Bomba being the biggest one).

But it's still one helluva blast, no nuclear reaction needed.

Puts our weapons programs into a bit of perspective, as if the Universe is saying, "You're really not so tough…"

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.