"US shoots down Death Star superlaser petition" Topic
9 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Science Plus Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article ESLO Terrain explains about their range of modular buildings.
Featured Profile Article Our Man in Southern California once again reports on GenCon California-style...
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| britishlinescarlet2 | 12 Jan 2013 4:27 a.m. PST |
|
| Henrix | 12 Jan 2013 6:04 a.m. PST |
I like the motivation "Why would we spend countless taxpayer dollars on a Death Star with a fundamental flaw that can be exploited by a one-man starship?" |
 John the OFM  | 12 Jan 2013 7:28 a.m. PST |
Name it after the chairman of the House Defense Appropriations Committee, and build it in his district, and you will see a change of heart. |
 Saginaw | 12 Jan 2013 8:10 a.m. PST |
Nothing but a "shock headline". They just wanted to use the word "quadrillion" to get a reaction. |
| Patrick R | 12 Jan 2013 10:50 a.m. PST |
Just when you need a Republican in the White House … |
| Toshach | 12 Jan 2013 7:48 p.m. PST |
I think the way this thing is supposed to work is to promise to build a component manufacturing facility in each state. Then sit back and let Congress take it from there. That's how all of the other defense contractors do it. |
| Rassilon | 12 Jan 2013 10:21 p.m. PST |
|
| skippy0001 | 13 Jan 2013 12:46 a.m. PST |
Next, they'll try to take away our Mark I Simple Blasters!!! |
| Space Monkey | 13 Jan 2013 3:25 a.m. PST |
I like how the reply turns into an endorsement/showcase for the REAL space programs and REAL science stuff going on RIGHT NOW. |
|
