Anyone care to venture how many days in jail this . . . attorney will rack up with this beginning to his brief?
TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 9TH
. . . .
Plaintiff **** hereby petitions for rehearing and rehearing
en banc pursuant to F.R.A.P, 35 and 40.
This proceeding involves several issues of great importance, including several Constitutional issues that are of first impression nationwide. Issues so important that the United States of America intervened into the case to defend them.
1. Paul Hupp's Petition For Rehearing And Rehearing en
Banc Case: 08-56403 06/21/2010 Page: 1 of 9 ID: 7380345
Second, let Plaintiff make this very clear hear and now at the beginning of this petition- this Court is now on notice that public will no longer tolerate violations of the Constitution, by the Congress or the judges/judiciary that think they can rig the system, violating basic constitutional rights (such as due process of law) and engage in these acts with impunity.
Plaintiff has news for these slime ball, piece of , ass clown judges (Bowie, Canby, Thomas and Fletcher-this means you) that think they are going to rig the system and railroad the poor and innocent- such as blocking the discovery process so the poor cannot defend themselves,
commit perjury in their orders and a host of other constitutional violations, and do it with impunity that is simply not going to happen in this case. You ers are now on notice. The facts of this case are going to come out, one way or the other. Remember that bitches.
The Court failed to address three (3) areas (the first of which is the most important, the Constitutional violations, questions of first impression nationwide);
1) Constitutional Violations;
2) Misconduct And Dirty Hands Of State Licensing Agency-California Commission On Teacher Credentialing; Dirty Hands Of Loan Holder Engaging In Fraud, Loan Holder Forcing Default; 3) Judicial Misconduct By Judge Bowie.
As stated earlier, the Court will address these issues ,or there will be civil unrest. Civil unrest that is going to start at the doorsteps of the slime ball, piece of judges that thought they were going to violate the constitutional rights of the innocent and poor with impunity.
When the Courts don't follow the law, then there is no law. With no 1aw you have nothing but anarchy and chaos, and then it is just a battle for survival. If that is what this Court wants, then that is what is is going to get.
This Court better remember that, because it is a fact of history, and nothing is going to change that. The decision of this Court on June 7, 2010 is a disgrace that is simply not going to stand opposed with impunity for the slime ball judges who wrote that decision.
Sorry my text recognition software had a lot of trouble with this court record so it may not be word for word and I did edit it a bit.
I will say this, the guy really likes the word "impunity".