Help support TMP


""The Vikings were Crusaders in the 8th Century"" Topic


15 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Broadcast Entertainment Plus Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

The QuarterMaster Table Top

Need 16 square feet of gaming space, built to order?


Featured Workbench Article

Making 28mm Scale Roads in Memory of Ian Weekley

combatpainter Fezian shows how to make roads, using the formula of the late Ian Weekley.


Featured Profile Article

Editor Katie's House That TMP Built

With help from TMP, our staff editor and her grandparents now have a place to live.


Featured Book Review


491 hits since 8 Nov 2009
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP08 Nov 2009 7:01 p.m. PST

Well, I just heard it on TV, so it must be true.
No, it wasn't anything on the History(sic) Channel. It was on "The Amazing Race".
That's what I get for leaving the TV on for background noise.

aecurtis Fezian08 Nov 2009 7:15 p.m. PST

Alternatively, there could be a claim to be made that the Crusaders were the Vikings of the 11th and 12th Centuries.

Allen

Whatisitgood4atwork08 Nov 2009 7:22 p.m. PST

Interesting. Is this part of the 'Crusaders were not heroes but really, really bad' revisionism? Or the 'Vikings were not so bad, just misunderstood traders who did not get on well with monks' revisionism?

So Vikings were not so bad, and Crusaders were baby-eating monsters, but they are pretty much the same thing.

Seems pretty clear…

PS btw, I have nothing against revisionism per se. Some things need revision.

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP08 Nov 2009 7:56 p.m. PST

No, thee was nothing ideological about it. IT was a breezy throwaway line byt the breathless narrator as the contestants collected gnomes.

Mike G08 Nov 2009 9:01 p.m. PST

1st time that I have ever watched the amazing race, caught the same statement. I perked up my ears and said to myself, "I don't think so".

Mike

Whatisitgood4atwork08 Nov 2009 9:43 p.m. PST

I guess there are *some* similarities: foreigners coming in, turning over the locals and taking what they could, and over a long period of time. Viking Kingdoms were set up, just as Crusader Kingdoms were.

To the guys at the wrong end of the pointy swords it must have seemed pretty similar.

But apart from that, not so much.

Wyatt the Odd Fezian08 Nov 2009 10:22 p.m. PST

Well, if you consider that the Vikings took over the area of Normandy and the Normans spread out and took over a fair number of areas – and that those duchies, kingdoms and etc. sent forces to the Holy Land during the Crusades…

Wyatt

GypsyComet08 Nov 2009 11:49 p.m. PST

Is this part of the 'Crusaders were not heroes but really, really bad' revisionism?

The Crusades were a human endeavor, and so inevitably somewhere between the extremes, at least on average. Anyone who claims that the extremes are universal cases has an agenda.

quidveritas09 Nov 2009 12:44 a.m. PST

I hate to say it, but Medieval Christians were not nice folks for the most part. IMO they used religion to further their personal aims and when religion proved inconvenient, they did what they wanted anyway.

That bunch of Italians sent as "reinforcements" were are responsible for the Christians being tossed out of the Holy land as any. The locals are not likely to support 'protectors' that conduct intermittent 'pogroms' in the name of God.

mjc

Whatisitgood4atwork09 Nov 2009 3:30 a.m. PST

[ … they used religion to further their personal aims and when religion proved inconvenient, they did what they wanted anyway.]

Shock. Horror! People really do that? Actually, do we ever do anything else?

Gattamalata09 Nov 2009 5:55 a.m. PST

Shock. Horror! People really do that? Actually, do we ever do anything else?

Pornography…evil grin

When Venetian Stradiotti pillaged Charles VIII's baggage train at Fornovo 1495, they were distracted by his erotic art collection.laugh

Last Hussar09 Nov 2009 7:12 a.m. PST

Let's ask Constantinople. Or we could do it Harry Hill style.

"Who were the worst? Vikings or Crusaders? There's only one way to find out…"

stenicplus09 Nov 2009 9:08 a.m. PST

Harry Hill gets on my whick these days. But my kids love him and I suppose they are his target audience.
Double Saturday of You've Been Framed and TV Burp.

lugal hdan09 Nov 2009 10:49 a.m. PST

Alternatively, there could be a claim to be made that the Crusaders were the Vikings of the 11th and 12th Centuries.

A very strong claim indeed, considering the ancestry of many of the Crusading nobility.

Roderick Robertson Fezian09 Nov 2009 4:57 p.m. PST

I notice *no-one* took the Futhark challenge, instead they all went to the amusement park and rode the big drop.

I do like the Globetrotters, but they *were* kind of mean to the girl who was afraid of heights *and* water…

Oh, yeah, back to the "vikings as crusaders" line – I usually expect better from the Amazing Race, but don't always get it.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.