Help support TMP


"Why do people use an " 's " for plural???" Topic


37 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Language Plus Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Politics By Other Means


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

28mm BeestWars Hyenas

Strangely intelligent hyenas for BeestWars.


Featured Workbench Article

The Camera Never Lies?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian photographs the same figure, with different cameras and equipment.


Featured Profile Article

Report from OrcCon 2008

Wyatt the Odd Fezian reports from OrcCon 2008.


Featured Book Review


1,409 hits since 11 Oct 2009
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP11 Oct 2009 3:57 p.m. PST

It drives me nuts.

I see it everywhere, and not just in TMP topic titles.

I see it in my door to door sales. The O'Brien family lives there, so the plaque reads "The O'Brien's".

I see it after an acronym or abbreviation: "Luke's force on Hoth was attacked by 4 AT-AT's!"

I see it after numbers: "The Germans wee shooting at the tanks with 88's."

WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!

The apostrophe denotes possessive, not plural.
A plain "s" is not only sufficient, but correct. The 's is wrong, and incorrect.

Yes, I have had this rant before. In a few months, I will have it again.

nazrat11 Oct 2009 4:00 p.m. PST

Keep on keepin' on, brother! You preach the gospel!

kyoteblue11 Oct 2009 4:10 p.m. PST

Have you tried drinking more beer?

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP11 Oct 2009 4:11 p.m. PST

Yes, I have. It does not help. They are still there.

streetline11 Oct 2009 4:13 p.m. PST

It signifies that something is missing. Often, an education.

kyoteblue11 Oct 2009 4:22 p.m. PST

Maybe if you drank more beer?

GoodBye11 Oct 2009 4:33 p.m. PST

I's use's S's at's the's end's of's everything's just's so's I's don't's misse's any's S's and's apostrophe's!

Donald's~

mad monkey 111 Oct 2009 4:44 p.m. PST

John, whatta yah mean it drives you nuts? I thought you were nuts already. :)

Personal logo Saginaw Supporting Member of TMP11 Oct 2009 5:08 p.m. PST

Uh, John? Check out the title of my new topic. I think I used the " 's " correctly. If not, feel free to don a habit and wrack my knuckles. evil grin

By the way, I'm in total agreement with you. Am I right in guessing that this is a recent trend?

Waco Joe11 Oct 2009 5:11 p.m. PST

Uh, the humbleapostrophe.com begs to differ: link

Oh and how do you know that the O'Brien living in the house is not the chief of his clan and therefore known as The O'Brien thereby making his house a singular possessive The O'Brien's?

grin

Don't mind me I am out of beer and just being contrary.

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP11 Oct 2009 5:17 p.m. PST

Too many esses, Saginaw.
You should have typed Broncos'… grin

The chief of the O'Brien clan would not be living in
Nanticoke, Pa.

jizbrand11 Oct 2009 6:00 p.m. PST

WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!

The apostrophe denotes possessive, not plural.


In modern parlance, the apostrophe is used to indicate that an "s" is coming up, just to prepare you. So, if I were to rewrite this sentence in correct modern English, it would look like this:

In modern parlance, the apos'trophe i's u'sed to indicate that an "'s" i's coming up, ju'st to prepare you. 'So, if I were to rewrite thi's 'sentence in correct modern Engli'sh, it would look like thi's:

Doe's that help?

GoodBye11 Oct 2009 6:13 p.m. PST

the apos'trophe

yOu mAde'S @ mI'sTake! It's 'sHOuld B apo'strOphe!!!

Whatisitgood4atwork11 Oct 2009 6:14 p.m. PST

Perhaps they ran out of paint and had meant to write 'The O'Brien's house."

Personal logo Saginaw Supporting Member of TMP11 Oct 2009 6:17 p.m. PST

Too many esses, Saginaw.
You should have typed Broncos'… grin

Thanks, John. I kinda had a feeling it looked "weird". grin

kyoteblue11 Oct 2009 6:39 p.m. PST

More beer ????

x42brown11 Oct 2009 7:47 p.m. PST
Cyrus the Great11 Oct 2009 8:04 p.m. PST

The original posting is found here:

TMP link

Running out of topics? Someone is going to accuse you of being a Hollywood movie executive!

aecurtis Fezian11 Oct 2009 9:44 p.m. PST

Arteis's post on the previous thread is essentially correct. In the past, it was accepted, often preferred, to use an apostrophe when forming the plural of lowercase letters, uppercase letters, numerals, and symbols.

Now, it is generally only considered correct to use the apostrophe when forming the plural of lowercase letters, as in the old phrase, "minding your p's and q's", which coincidentally, stems from old typesetting practice (the two characters being mirror images, it was easy to confuse them).

But past practice has been generally overturned in the other previously-allowed cases, so that one now correctly writes:

"in the 1960s"

"two Mercury XMs"

…and as odd as it looks:

"One should not use & s in formal writing." (The space is deliberate.)

Different style manuals may reflect different practices, but in general, this is the current preferred usage. It may change yet again before the next time th OFM brings it up.

Allen

Personal logo Gungnir Supporting Member of TMP11 Oct 2009 10:11 p.m. PST

Thank you for this explanation/reminder, John. For me as a non-native English speaker this is a constant source of confusion.

Connard Sage12 Oct 2009 12:01 a.m. PST

Its di'sgraceful :)

vaughan12 Oct 2009 3:32 a.m. PST

I was taught English in England and can assert that the 's has nothing to do with plurals. The ' replaces one or more letters in a contraction, to say otherwise is not fashion but plain wrong. I agree with John the OFM.

AndrewGPaul12 Oct 2009 3:48 a.m. PST

So what's missing in "This is John's coat"? I suppose you could say it's a contraction from "This is the coat belonging to John", but that's quite a stretch.

Connard Sage12 Oct 2009 3:52 a.m. PST

Yes, but is it 'James coat', 'James' coat' or 'James's coat'?

evil grin

vaughan12 Oct 2009 5:17 a.m. PST

"This is John's coat" the explaination would be " John (hi)'s coat.
Assuming one James it would be James's coat

AndrewGPaul12 Oct 2009 5:56 a.m. PST

"James' coat " was how I was taught, with "James's" being a little awkward.

UltraOrk12 Oct 2009 6:19 a.m. PST

Because they're stupid.

Klebert L Hall12 Oct 2009 7:51 a.m. PST

Because they don't know how to punctuate correctly.
-Kle.

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP12 Oct 2009 8:15 a.m. PST

Allen authoritatively proclaimed:

as in the old phrase, "minding your p's and q's", which coincidentally, stems from old typesetting practice (the two characters being mirror images, it was easy to confuse them).

I have always heard that it meant "Watch your pint's and quart's".

Ditto Tango 2 112 Oct 2009 10:25 a.m. PST

Assuming one James it would be James's coat

As Andrew Paul says, this is incorrect. POssessive of words ending in s is just apostrohe, ie James' coat.
--
Tim

vaughan12 Oct 2009 2:32 p.m. PST

OK, what about St.James's palace and St.James's park?

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP12 Oct 2009 7:40 p.m. PST

St. James Infirmary?

DeanMoto12 Oct 2009 8:25 p.m. PST

Because they're stupid.

or…"Because they's stupid."

Cacique Caribe13 Oct 2009 1:13 a.m. PST

Here ya go, John:

picture

CC

AndrewGPaul14 Oct 2009 1:26 a.m. PST

OK, what about St.James's palace and St.James's park?

I'd say they should be "St. James' palace" and "St. James' park", if you were simply referring to a palace and park owned by St. James. However, as both of those are proper names, they don't, strictly speaking, need to conform to the proper rules. In any case, it should be "St. James's Palace" and "St. James's Park". grin

Last Hussar15 Oct 2009 5:44 p.m. PST

Ah- the infamous "Greengrocer's apostrophy"
Orange's 20p. The orange has money, apparently!

For the Confused and the Foriegn (hey that sounds like a set of rules…)

Plural (only)- S (no apostrophy).
"Look at the boys."

To indicate that a singular noun owns the noun following- 's.
"Look at that boy's game" (one boy, owns the game)

To indicate that a plural noun owns the noun following- s'.
"Look at the boys' game" (many boys own the game)

"Stackable"
"The Boy's games' dice" (The dice from many games, all of which belong to one boy).

The other use of the apostrophy is to denote missing letters in contractions ("I can't speak the cant")

I must admit I'm not sure with acronyms and abbreviations.

Main Battle Tank -> MBT
but Main Battle Tanks- the initials are still MBT, but with out the 's' it isn't clear there are many. I've been going with:
MBTs.

The G Dog Fezian30 Nov 2009 8:28 p.m. PST

You have not had enough beer's.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.