John the OFM  | 11 Oct 2009 3:57 p.m. PST |
It drives me nuts. I see it everywhere, and not just in TMP topic titles. I see it in my door to door sales. The O'Brien family lives there, so the plaque reads "The O'Brien's". I see it after an acronym or abbreviation: "Luke's force on Hoth was attacked by 4 AT-AT's!" I see it after numbers: "The Germans wee shooting at the tanks with 88's." WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! The apostrophe denotes possessive, not plural. A plain "s" is not only sufficient, but correct. The 's is wrong, and incorrect. Yes, I have had this rant before. In a few months, I will have it again. |
| nazrat | 11 Oct 2009 4:00 p.m. PST |
Keep on keepin' on, brother! You preach the gospel! |
| kyoteblue | 11 Oct 2009 4:10 p.m. PST |
Have you tried drinking more beer? |
John the OFM  | 11 Oct 2009 4:11 p.m. PST |
Yes, I have. It does not help. They are still there. |
| streetline | 11 Oct 2009 4:13 p.m. PST |
It signifies that something is missing. Often, an education. |
| kyoteblue | 11 Oct 2009 4:22 p.m. PST |
Maybe if you drank more beer? |
| GoodBye | 11 Oct 2009 4:33 p.m. PST |
I's use's S's at's the's end's of's everything's just's so's I's don't's misse's any's S's and's apostrophe's! Donald's~ |
| mad monkey 1 | 11 Oct 2009 4:44 p.m. PST |
John, whatta yah mean it drives you nuts? I thought you were nuts already. :) |
Saginaw  | 11 Oct 2009 5:08 p.m. PST |
Uh, John? Check out the title of my new topic. I think I used the " 's " correctly. If not, feel free to don a habit and wrack my knuckles.  By the way, I'm in total agreement with you. Am I right in guessing that this is a recent trend? |
| Waco Joe | 11 Oct 2009 5:11 p.m. PST |
Uh, the humbleapostrophe.com begs to differ: link Oh and how do you know that the O'Brien living in the house is not the chief of his clan and therefore known as The O'Brien thereby making his house a singular possessive The O'Brien's? 
Don't mind me I am out of beer and just being contrary. |
John the OFM  | 11 Oct 2009 5:17 p.m. PST |
Too many esses, Saginaw. You should have typed Broncos'
 The chief of the O'Brien clan would not be living in Nanticoke, Pa. |
| jizbrand | 11 Oct 2009 6:00 p.m. PST |
WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!The apostrophe denotes possessive, not plural. In modern parlance, the apostrophe is used to indicate that an "s" is coming up, just to prepare you. So, if I were to rewrite this sentence in correct modern English, it would look like this: In modern parlance, the apos'trophe i's u'sed to indicate that an "'s" i's coming up, ju'st to prepare you. 'So, if I were to rewrite thi's 'sentence in correct modern Engli'sh, it would look like thi's: Doe's that help? |
| GoodBye | 11 Oct 2009 6:13 p.m. PST |
the apos'trophe yOu mAde'S @ mI'sTake! It's 'sHOuld B apo'strOphe!!! |
| Whatisitgood4atwork | 11 Oct 2009 6:14 p.m. PST |
Perhaps they ran out of paint and had meant to write 'The O'Brien's house." |
Saginaw  | 11 Oct 2009 6:17 p.m. PST |
Too many esses, Saginaw. You should have typed Broncos'
 Thanks, John. I kinda had a feeling it looked "weird".  |
| kyoteblue | 11 Oct 2009 6:39 p.m. PST |
|
| x42brown | 11 Oct 2009 7:47 p.m. PST |
|
| Cyrus the Great | 11 Oct 2009 8:04 p.m. PST |
The original posting is found here: TMP link Running out of topics? Someone is going to accuse you of being a Hollywood movie executive! |
aecurtis  | 11 Oct 2009 9:44 p.m. PST |
Arteis's post on the previous thread is essentially correct. In the past, it was accepted, often preferred, to use an apostrophe when forming the plural of lowercase letters, uppercase letters, numerals, and symbols. Now, it is generally only considered correct to use the apostrophe when forming the plural of lowercase letters, as in the old phrase, "minding your p's and q's", which coincidentally, stems from old typesetting practice (the two characters being mirror images, it was easy to confuse them). But past practice has been generally overturned in the other previously-allowed cases, so that one now correctly writes: "in the 1960s" "two Mercury XMs"
and as odd as it looks: "One should not use & s in formal writing." (The space is deliberate.) Different style manuals may reflect different practices, but in general, this is the current preferred usage. It may change yet again before the next time th OFM brings it up. Allen |
Gungnir  | 11 Oct 2009 10:11 p.m. PST |
Thank you for this explanation/reminder, John. For me as a non-native English speaker this is a constant source of confusion. |
| Connard Sage | 12 Oct 2009 12:01 a.m. PST |
|
| vaughan | 12 Oct 2009 3:32 a.m. PST |
I was taught English in England and can assert that the 's has nothing to do with plurals. The ' replaces one or more letters in a contraction, to say otherwise is not fashion but plain wrong. I agree with John the OFM. |
| AndrewGPaul | 12 Oct 2009 3:48 a.m. PST |
So what's missing in "This is John's coat"? I suppose you could say it's a contraction from "This is the coat belonging to John", but that's quite a stretch. |
| Connard Sage | 12 Oct 2009 3:52 a.m. PST |
Yes, but is it 'James coat', 'James' coat' or 'James's coat'? 
|
| vaughan | 12 Oct 2009 5:17 a.m. PST |
"This is John's coat" the explaination would be " John (hi)'s coat. Assuming one James it would be James's coat |
| AndrewGPaul | 12 Oct 2009 5:56 a.m. PST |
"James' coat " was how I was taught, with "James's" being a little awkward. |
| UltraOrk | 12 Oct 2009 6:19 a.m. PST |
|
| Klebert L Hall | 12 Oct 2009 7:51 a.m. PST |
Because they don't know how to punctuate correctly. -Kle. |
John the OFM  | 12 Oct 2009 8:15 a.m. PST |
Allen authoritatively proclaimed:
as in the old phrase, "minding your p's and q's", which coincidentally, stems from old typesetting practice (the two characters being mirror images, it was easy to confuse them).
I have always heard that it meant "Watch your pint's and quart's". |
| Ditto Tango 2 1 | 12 Oct 2009 10:25 a.m. PST |
Assuming one James it would be James's coat As Andrew Paul says, this is incorrect. POssessive of words ending in s is just apostrohe, ie James' coat. -- Tim |
| vaughan | 12 Oct 2009 2:32 p.m. PST |
OK, what about St.James's palace and St.James's park? |
John the OFM  | 12 Oct 2009 7:40 p.m. PST |
|
| DeanMoto | 12 Oct 2009 8:25 p.m. PST |
Because they're stupid. or
"Because they's stupid." |
| Cacique Caribe | 13 Oct 2009 1:13 a.m. PST |
|
| AndrewGPaul | 14 Oct 2009 1:26 a.m. PST |
OK, what about St.James's palace and St.James's park?
I'd say they should be "St. James' palace" and "St. James' park", if you were simply referring to a palace and park owned by St. James. However, as both of those are proper names, they don't, strictly speaking, need to conform to the proper rules. In any case, it should be "St. James's Palace" and "St. James's Park".  |
| Last Hussar | 15 Oct 2009 5:44 p.m. PST |
Ah- the infamous "Greengrocer's apostrophy" Orange's 20p. The orange has money, apparently! For the Confused and the Foriegn (hey that sounds like a set of rules
) Plural (only)- S (no apostrophy). "Look at the boys." To indicate that a singular noun owns the noun following- 's. "Look at that boy's game" (one boy, owns the game) To indicate that a plural noun owns the noun following- s'. "Look at the boys' game" (many boys own the game) "Stackable" "The Boy's games' dice" (The dice from many games, all of which belong to one boy). The other use of the apostrophy is to denote missing letters in contractions ("I can't speak the cant") I must admit I'm not sure with acronyms and abbreviations. Main Battle Tank -> MBT but Main Battle Tanks- the initials are still MBT, but with out the 's' it isn't clear there are many. I've been going with: MBTs. |
The G Dog  | 30 Nov 2009 8:28 p.m. PST |
You have not had enough beer's. |