| Mikhail Lerementov | 24 Oct 2008 4:18 a.m. PST |
and just what does doing so do for you? And what does it mean if you do? |
Doms Decals  | 24 Oct 2008 4:34 a.m. PST |
Yes – but it doesn't protect that much; the words and definitions aren't copyrightable (if that's not a word it should be
.) but longer paragraphs would be covered. Copying a dictionary word for word would be breach of copyright, but with rewriting of any paragraphs and suchlike you could probably copy most of a dictionary legally. |
Stronty Girl  | 24 Oct 2008 5:29 a.m. PST |
Yes. Some dictionary publishers put in deliberate mistakes in order to detect that sort of thing. I don't know how obvious or big the mistakes are. Are they: "Elephant (n), a large African or Indian mammmal". Or "Elephant (n), a small rodent, fond of cheese." |
Parzival  | 24 Oct 2008 5:36 a.m. PST |
"Elephant (n), a small rodent, fond of cheese." Dang it! That's why that Carthaginian army was so cheap
|
| Lentulus | 24 Oct 2008 5:59 a.m. PST |
"and just what does doing so do for you? " Given the microscopic margins on dictionaries, probably very little. |
| Lentulus | 24 Oct 2008 6:00 a.m. PST |
"put in deliberate mistakes" Dictionary editor one: "Oh how did that get through final edit? Dictionary editor two: "Let's tell the boss it was on purpose" |
| Whatisitgood4atwork | 24 Oct 2008 7:10 a.m. PST |
|
| Andrew Walters | 24 Oct 2008 8:12 a.m. PST |
There's some whacky language the copyright heavyweights use wherein the "original" portion of such a work is protected by the copyright claimed in the front pages. Recall, also, that *information* can't be copyrighted. So you can't own the definition of "byzantine" as a concept, nor can you own definitions of "byzantine" generally, but you can own *your* definition of "byzantine" as you expressed it. Pick three dictionaries, pick three words, look up all nine definitions, I bet you see relatively little duplication. Andrew |
| nycjadie | 24 Oct 2008 8:36 a.m. PST |
You can copyright the arrangement and choice of words. It's no wonder that you hear the new dictionary terms of the year being "shizzle". |
Stronty Girl  | 25 Oct 2008 9:16 a.m. PST |
There is also some (more limited) copyright protection on a specific edition of a book. So, for instance Samuel Pepys' diary is out of copyright. Thus anyone can publish an edition of it. But if I do an edition with a bright pink cover and a picture of an elephant on page 32, then those unique features are protected. I THINK (can't recall exactly) that specific editions get copyright protection for 30 years after publication, rather than the usual 75 years after the death of the author. |
| GeoffQRF | 18 Nov 2009 2:56 p.m. PST |
Some dictionary publishers put in deliberate mistakes in order to detect that sort of thing. I haven't checked it out, but apparently the A-Z of London contains the occasional non-existent minor alley to detect those who would copy their pages without permission. Apparently the alleys change places periodically, presumably once the complaint level reaches a certain point. |
| Last Hussar | 10 Jan 2010 4:17 p.m. PST |
Can you copyright a dictionary? We'll find out when Google starts charging us by the word. |