Help support TMP


"Earth/Mars/Moon have different origin" Topic


12 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Science Plus Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Risus


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Small Storage Packs from Charon

When you only need to carry 72 28mm figures (or less)...


Featured Workbench Article

3Dprinting Recessed Bases

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian experiments with using recessed bases for figures with cast-on bases.


Featured Profile Article

How Scurvy Got His "Style"

How Scurvy developed his unique approach to miniatures.


Current Poll


256 hits since 30 Apr 2008
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Mardaddy19 Mar 2008 10:46 p.m. PST

link

Interesting little tidbit…

ttauri20 Mar 2008 1:43 a.m. PST

Last quote in the article sums it up;

"To think that we can get definitive information about the bulk composition of Mars from a handful of meteorites," he said, "all likely from the same area of the Martian crust, is very optimistic."

Early days and it seems to ignore the effects of differentiation.

Dances With Words Fezian20 Mar 2008 2:20 a.m. PST

ok…that does it! We're going to have to send a scouting party out in Mr. Peabody's WAYBACK machine and get it on videophone…

(then we can put the hi-speed video on youtube!!)

*slish…slish*

Sgt DWW-bartentacle on duty

Stealth100020 Mar 2008 3:29 a.m. PST

Thanks for that Mardaddy. Interesting.

Tony
occultwars.com

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP20 Mar 2008 9:11 a.m. PST

I have always wondered how anyone can definitively say that "this" meteorite is of lunar origin, and "that" one comes from Mars. No one has been able to explain that to me.

Ditto Tango 2 120 Mar 2008 12:55 p.m. PST

God put them there, JOhn.
--
Tim

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP20 Mar 2008 2:50 p.m. PST

Well, that explains it. Explains pretty much everything, too!

Streitax20 Mar 2008 3:06 p.m. PST

Yeah, good ol' Deus ex Machina. We owe those Greeks a lot!

Augustus Supporting Member of TMP20 Mar 2008 10:34 p.m. PST

Moon meteorites are comparisons with Apollo lunar samples. They are also extremely rare – the total allotment numbering something less than 3 lbs or something.

The same is true for comparisons of gas bubbles within meteorites that correspond within a very slight molecular composition range of those constituent with Mars via Viking readings. Also, many of the certified Mars rocks were actually observed to fall. As it is right now, there are only 22 (?) certified Mars rocks. IIRC, Antarctica has the most strikes of both Lunar and Mars rocks. Other observed meteors can be backtracked to a likely origin. Most though come from the asteroid belt.

Lastly, age of the rock's formation is indicative. At 4.5 billion years old, the rock likely came from the asteroid belt. If younger, say around 1.5 billion, then it is likely the rock came from a geologic source of high activity at that point like Mercury, Venus, or Mars. Hope this helps.

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP21 Mar 2008 6:12 p.m. PST

So "Martian" meteorites were observed to fall? Again, how do you know they came from Mars, unless "directly".

Augustus Supporting Member of TMP22 Mar 2008 12:07 a.m. PST

As I understand orbital calculations, there are only so many options available to a rock on a given course, given velocity, given insertion, etc. So, our typical meteor can be calculated out to where it arrived from given its orbital insertion and location.

As to whether the rock may have come from Mars many many years ago, or the astroid belt, or somewhere else, composition data and examination of the rock determine its origin. Something like 86% of meteorites that have been recovered contained chrondites – which are just rounded particulate silicates that formed billions and billions of years ago. These are such old formations that they certainly come from the asteroid belt and are leftovers from bits that were not formed into planets.

The other very small percentage contains achrondites which were formed in higher gravity environments. Of these, many of these are similar in age, make-up, and form to those recovered by the Apollo missions. These are likely leftover strikes of Moon bits. The other even smaller percentage bears almost exact correlation to data from Viking's readings of Martian regolith and match each other. These data include chemical, isotopic, and petrologic compositions that are dead ringers for what the Viking missions had.

You probably could not confirm without a shadow of doubt about a meteorite's origin without analyzing it's makeup. While thousands of meteorites hit the Earth each year, calculations may only get you so far depending on how long a given rock has been able to be observed. So, assuming the observation aspect falters, the best answer as to where it comes from is by recovering the rock and seeing where the data of its composition leads you.

blackscribe18 Jun 2009 2:49 p.m. PST

The easy explanation (AFAICT) is that the Earth, Moon, and Mars all belong here. However, whatever body the asteroid belt came from was an interloper from elsewhere that was captured and ripped apart by tidal forces.

Some of the identification is performed by mass spectrometry. A particular ratio of some isotopes supports other evidence of a body's origin. One of the seven MSes capable of that work used to be around the corner and upstairs from where I'm typing this. I don't know what became of it after that guy retired.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.