Help support TMP


"UK Govt sword ban response" Topic


27 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to The Law Plus Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Profile Article

Laser Wood Discs at Hobby Lobby

Useful wooden shapes from Hobby Lobby?


Current Poll


168 hits since 30 Apr 2008
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

streetline06 Jun 2007 4:13 p.m. PST

OK. I don't have a horse in this race especially, but seeing as it generated some discussion when the petition went up – here's the repsonse:

link

Please try not to take this to CA. Ah, please yourselves. ;-)

aka Mikefoster06 Jun 2007 4:20 p.m. PST

A quick read of this and I get that they are considering all of the opinions on the subject. I think that it will quietly disappear and little more will be said about it.

Wargamer Blue06 Jun 2007 4:34 p.m. PST

Swords are prohibited weapons in my state. You are allowed to have them if they are part of a collection and not sharpened, or if you use them for a cultural event ie sword dancing, or sport, ie martial arts.

Daffy Doug06 Jun 2007 5:07 p.m. PST

Rat, that's why table/chair legs are now the preferred assault weapon. How absurd can this get, I mean really?

1066.us

Go0gle06 Jun 2007 5:21 p.m. PST

Swords are allowed as part of collections here…sharpened or not. If carried in public then they are required to be registered much like firearms or dull and blunted. My blade is my preferred home intrusion response system. Doesn't disturb the neighbors nearly as much…

thabear06 Jun 2007 5:39 p.m. PST

As part of a re-enactment group in Australia , i have to be sure to be able to justify why im carrying any of my swords in public , ie: on my way to training , or on my way to an event , i've never had a problem with the Cops if theyve pulled me up . Although i have seen one knobhead wear his sword on his back while on his motorcycle , and then give the cops greif for pulling him up . Its only a few rotten apples spoil the fun for the rest of us .

t

Toaster06 Jun 2007 7:53 p.m. PST

I used to walk 3km to reenactment in full getup, the sword that would have got an armed offenders callout if carried on it's own got just a smile and a wave when in costume. The only time I got stopped was when someone rang the police to report me threatening someone, what actually happened was that he pulled a video camera and said "show me some moves."

Robert

Saxondog06 Jun 2007 8:59 p.m. PST

Never underestimate government twits with to much time and not enough media attention for their tiny little egos. They'll be outlawing blue jackets or wooden spoons or something next. They really can't adjust to not controlling how people do things. Party, sex, religion, or any other faction is always put aside to boost their little egos when they want to control something or get their names in the press.

Patrick R06 Jun 2007 10:36 p.m. PST

"Will somebody please think of the children ?"

No Name0206 Jun 2007 11:16 p.m. PST

I the UK a Viking re-enactor was able to get his sword back, after the police confiscated it as an offensive weapon.

He claimed that in his religion he would not be able to enter Valhalla unless he died with a sword in his hand.

Sheiks are also obliged to carry swords as part of their religion.

quidveritas06 Jun 2007 11:47 p.m. PST

How are you supposed to conduct your duels? Forks at 30 paces? ;-)

Never really thought about this too much. Growing up in Montana, Guns were a way of life as were "pig stickers" (large knives). On the ranch, we regularly used guns and large knives for legitimate purposes.

I guess the question is: What legitimate purpose is served by owning a sword?

Another way to look at this is how is a sword more dangerous to your child than a newly sharpend lawn mower blade or a sharp chef's knife? Seems to me the latter would be a more likely source of grief to a child.

Never heard of a sword being used in conjunction with a crime in my limited experience of 50+ years -- so why ban them?

mjc

Swampster06 Jun 2007 11:57 p.m. PST

There has been at least one case in the UK of a Samurai sword being used in an attack on people in a church. I think there was at least one fatality.

Renevent07 Jun 2007 12:22 a.m. PST

The current law, in New South Wales, here in Australia, is a sword may be freely worn, as long as it is an essential part of a costume, FOR A PURPOSE. So you need a costume, and a reason for the costume. That, as it was explained to me by the officer in charge of licaning and weapon offences, serves to allow Martial artists, re-enactors, dancers etc to have there toys, and makes sure anyone doing anything dodgy will be remembered. No one is going to use a western style sword in a crime, because they are to hard to get hold of, and too expensive. My re-enactment swords cost AUD$110+…. a hachet costs $5… a machette $10…. Katanas are slightly different, because you can get them cheap anywhere… and note, most cheap swords, like you get on e-bay or at dodgy markets are designed to incorporate at least one fatal flaw, meaning they are made to break if you hit anything with them.

Robin Bobcat07 Jun 2007 1:01 a.m. PST

Neh.. We've had a couple lunatics wielding swords over here in the US. Most recent was the guy who'd lost touch with reality to the point he thought he was his character from Shadowrun. An Elf character. A *female* elf character..

Frankly, I'd rather have a sword in every house than a gun in every house.

IainJL07 Jun 2007 1:29 a.m. PST

When taking my exams at Oxford one of the students exploited some of the older rules to have a pint of beer delivered to his desk (apparently you have the right to this).

The university got him back by fining him for NOT wearing a sword.

hurcheon07 Jun 2007 2:41 a.m. PST

IainJL

I've heard the same story about Glasgow Uni.

In our reenactment group one of the first phrases we learned was

"Hones officer, it's just a theatrical prop"

Dn Jackson07 Jun 2007 6:57 a.m. PST

It's amazing how many people are willing to let the government tell them what it is Ok for them to own or not own. Amazing and sad really. I won't even license my cats.

Eclectic Wave07 Jun 2007 8:20 a.m. PST

I know of at least 2 deaths related to being hit with a bowling ball, so my god, we better ban them as well.

On a side note, I have seen recently, people bringing their bowling ball onto a plane as their carry on. We have to keep the 5 ounce bottles of shampoo off the plane, but the 20 pound bowling ball is fine. Why is it you put someone in government and their IQ turns to mush?

Hundvig Fezian07 Jun 2007 8:27 a.m. PST

I the UK a Viking re-enactor was able to get his sword back, after the police confiscated it as an offensive weapon.

He claimed that in his religion he would not be able to enter Valhalla unless he died with a sword in his hand.

Now that's just untrue. Axes are fine too, and you can be empty-handed as long as you die with you teeth sunk in the throat of your enemy.

The Aesir really aren't as uptight about afterlife qualifications as most mythologies…

GildasFacit Sponsoring Member of TMP07 Jun 2007 8:31 a.m. PST

Justin, I think you means Sikhs – and they are Knives, not swords.

Old Slow Trot07 Jun 2007 9:13 a.m. PST

Just what I was gonna say.The Sikhs.

RockyRusso07 Jun 2007 9:19 a.m. PST

Hi

Decades ago, I bought a bolo from an igarot friend in the Philippines. It has been in every vehicle I have ever driven. I refer to it as a "camping tool".

Living in bad places, producing it in the face of knives, chains and bats got folk running.

Rocky

Supreme Dalek07 Jun 2007 4:04 p.m. PST

A few years ago a former Member of Parliament, Nigel Jones was attacked with a Samurai sword by a disgruntled constituent. His assistant intervened and was killed!

link

Supreme Dalek07 Jun 2007 4:08 p.m. PST

I hate chef's knives. They should be banned too!

Double Ace08 Jun 2007 10:27 p.m. PST

I imagine any current, or retired Gurkhas will be very displeased with such a law as well.

iouliared09 Jun 2007 4:28 a.m. PST

I once stubbed my toe on a putty knife that was lying on the floor. Can we ban those too?

von Scharnhorst11 Jul 2007 3:51 a.m. PST

The reply keeps on about SAMURAI swords.

THAT WAS NOT WHAT THE INITIAL BILL SAID. It said "SWORDS".

Hence many of the re-enactment groups, from all periods, and Heathen groups that carry swords as ritual devices got involved.

NOW they change the goal posts!!!

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.