Help support TMP


Warfare in Neolithic Europe


Author
Julian Maxwell Heath
Type
Non-fiction
Status
In Print
Publisher
Pen & Sword Archaeology (2017)

advocate writes:

"warfare in that period was grim and barbaric"
And in other periods it's light and civilised? Hard to say at this distance, unless they have evidence that it was unremitting.
It would be interesting to know the scale of the societies we are talking about, and the number of combatants.



Rate This Book

If you have read this book, please rate it from 1 (low) to 10 (high).

TMP Members can rate this book. Would you like to be a member?


Back to BOOKS FOR WARGAMERS


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Basic Impetus


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

The Amazing Worlds of Grenadier

The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.


Featured Profile Article

Editor Julia's 2015 Christmas Project

Editor Julia would like your support for a special project.


Current Poll


This entry created 17 September 2019. Last revised on 17 September 2019.

2,895 hits since 17 Sep 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


Warfare in Neolithic Europe

An Archeological and Anthropological Analysis

138 pages. 16 pages of black-and-white illustrations. Introduction, index, notes, and bibliography.

The author sets out to explore a question much debated by modern scholars – were Europeans in the Neolithic period peaceful agrarians or warriors?

The Neolithic period (also known as the New Stone Age) is the time in history when people began to transition from hunter-gatherers to farmers. Was this a peaceful process as cultures changed, or was there a conquest of one type of people by another?

Later in the period, we see the appearance of the Beaker and Corded Ware cultures, with evidence for a possible warrior or ruling caste. Again, did this culture spread by assimilation or by conquest?

The author addresses these questions by sifting through the evidence, from older to younger, from southeast Europe to Ireland. When was a walled settlement a fortress, rather than just a corral or religious site? When a burial shows signs of violent death, was it warfare, accident, or just a crime? Which weapons were multi-purpose, versus exclusive instruments of war? What can primitive artwork tell us about weapons and tactics? What were the different reasons for cannibalism, and how can it be detected in the archaeological record?

And if war, as Clausewitz tells us, is "...the continuation of state policy with other means," can you call it warfare before states even existed?

The author also surveys what we know of tribal cultures in the modern age, to see what insight might be provided when examining the Neolithic evidence. For example, in a time before money, when few possessions were portable, why would people fight each other? Could what looks like warfare in the evidence actually be ritualistic, non-violent behavior?

This is a scholarly book, dry at times, and the evidence does get repetitive after a while. The Neolithic period is, by definition, uncivilized, and the evidence from this book shows that warfare in that period was grim and barbaric.

The wargaming reader may be disappointed that the author lets the evidence speak for itself, and draws few conclusions about Neolithic warfare. However, the diligent reader will pick up many tips that would be useful in a Neolithic wargame campaign (or even a fantasy campaign).

An interesting, well researched book. Recommended.

Reviewed by Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian.