Help support TMP


"Color of Guadalcanal LST's?" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Naval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two at Sea

Featured Profile Article

Council of Five Nations 2010

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian is back from Council of Five Nations.


Featured Book Review


1,221 hits since 10 Mar 2006
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

sscott10 Mar 2006 4:36 a.m. PST

I've been working on a set of ships for the Solomons Campaign and was wondering if the LST's were grey or green or camo. Anyone have any information?

-S

Personal logo McKinstry Supporting Member of TMP Fezian10 Mar 2006 8:12 a.m. PST

I've no immediate access to my books but all the green camo LST's I've seen have been a Measure 32 type variants that were later in the war. Just a guess but I'd expect grey or one of the earlier common measures such as 12 or 21.

CorpCommander10 Mar 2006 10:35 a.m. PST

they were a bluish grey. Here is a color photo of one landing in Italy. picture

Here is a watercolor:
picture

Here are more photos though the LST here is not what I'd call "mint" shape:
link

This one shows the color very nicely:
link

sscott10 Mar 2006 11:23 a.m. PST

That makes it easy for me, then

Thanks

CorpCommander10 Mar 2006 2:27 p.m. PST

But wait there is more!

I did manage to find a picture of the US San Bernardino County that was camouflaged!!!

picture
LST-1110 at West Kukum Beach, Guadalcanal, 18 August 1945.

Here is another shot of the same ship also in camo but B/W
picture

Ed Mohrmann Supporting Member of TMP10 Mar 2006 6:20 p.m. PST

Well, your title specifies Guadalcanal LST's and, for
the August, 1942 landing, there weren't any LST's
present.

Do you mean LST's at Guad (none present) or LST's in the
Solomons (later in the war) ?

sscott11 Mar 2006 11:04 a.m. PST

Bleeped text.

So there were just AKA's and APA's for the '42 invasion?

Ed Mohrmann Supporting Member of TMP11 Mar 2006 5:29 p.m. PST

For the most part, yes. There were a few civilian ships
pressed into service, but for the most part the 15
auxiliaries carrying troops were such as the Hunter
Liggett, McCawley, George F. Eliot and so forth.

A couple of the President ships (Coolidge and Grant)
participated later on in the campaign, but the invasion
forces didn't include any, I believe.

All the beaching craft (LCI's, LST's, etc.) were tied-up
by the JCS for the Torch landings. Those were, at the
time, fairly new and only much later did
the SW Pac and S. Pac get a lot of beaching craft
(MacArthur's amphibious support was mostly these types
of vessels).

Ed Mohrmann Supporting Member of TMP11 Mar 2006 5:31 p.m. PST

Almost forgot: there were also 8 APD's carrying troops
for the Guadalcanal landings.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.