![The Miniatures Page logo](tmpshead.jpg)
"Early Crusader Knights" Topic
9 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestMedieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
Featured Movie Review
|
Extra Crispy ![Sponsoring Member of TMP Sponsoring Member of TMP](boards/icons/sponsor.gif) | 23 May 2024 4:04 p.m. PST |
Can one use normal mounted Norman cavalry as early Crusader knights? Thinking of doing a Crusader army in 15mm. |
Perris0707 | 23 May 2024 5:01 p.m. PST |
Yes you can. Most of the knights of 1097-99 looked like the knights of the Bayeux Tapestry/Norman Conquest. |
Rakkasan | 24 May 2024 7:45 a.m. PST |
In support of Perris0707, Ian Heath in "Armies and Enemies of the Crusades 1096-1291" writes that "it is generally accepted, quite rightly, that the knights of the First Crusade and, to a lesser extent, the Second Crusade would have been little different from the Norman knights depicted in the Bayeux Tapestry…" |
TimePortal | 24 May 2024 11:49 p.m. PST |
Yes looking at medieval paintings of early crusades a couple of things stood out. The similarity to Norman armor is a big one. The use of bright heraldry colors with crosses painted over their shield heraldry. It was striking to see crosses on tunics and shields in a variety of colors, some were white, black, red, green, blue, and brown. |
Druzhina | 25 May 2024 4:51 a.m. PST |
|
Garand | 25 May 2024 7:35 a.m. PST |
In support of Perris0707, Ian Heath in "Armies and Enemies of the Crusades 1096-1291" writes that "it is generally accepted, quite rightly, that the knights of the First Crusade and, to a lesser extent, the Second Crusade would have been little different from the Norman knights depicted in the Bayeux Tapestry…" I'd dispute this. Besides mail sleeves becoming longer, fashion changed a bit between the 1st Crusade & the 2nd, principally the length of tunics becoming more like robes or gowns, which would be a visual difference even on fully armored figures. Damon. |
Druzhina | 25 May 2024 5:35 p.m. PST |
|
Swampster | 27 May 2024 11:49 a.m. PST |
One is rather forced to use Normans as specific first crusade figures are few and far between. Khurasan's 1st Crusade range uses the same knights as the Norman range. OG15s 1stC range has figures from various other ranges including Normans and Spanish. The Italians in the range do have mail sleeves to the wrist but seem to have surcoats as well which I'm dubious of. For 2nd & 3rd Crusades I would use Legio Heroica except I think they are unavailable. Mirliton are also late 12th century and would just about fit 2nd Crusade, though some of the helmets are probably a bit too rounded and some of the shields are flat topped kits. They are very suitable for the 3rd Crusade and are based closely on link One thing which would help to make the figures look less like Bayeux tapestry Normans is to use different shield designs. Early 12th century shields are shown with a variety of devices which tend to be a lot more geometric than the 1066 curvy crosses and beasts. You can see this on Druzhina's example and there is a good selection at link They are a decade or so after the 1stC but perhaps show the way that most of the Crusading nations have already gone. |
Druzhina | 28 May 2024 10:22 p.m. PST |
|
|