Tango01 | 16 Feb 2024 4:40 p.m. PST |
…in Scotland 4,000 Years Ago "In the '90s, a team excavating a stone quarry in Scotland unearthed the 4,000-year-old skeletal remains of a young woman. She'd been laid to rest in a crouched position in a stone-lined grave. Archaeologists nicknamed her the Upper Largie Woman after the Upper Largie Quarry, where she was found.
Now, an artist has created a reconstruction of what she may have looked like during her lifetime in the early Bronze Age. Her remains have been carefully reburied, but the reconstructed bust is now on display at the Kilmartin Museum in Scotland. The museum reopened earlier this month after being closed for three years during a $8.4 USD million (£7 million) renovation project, per Sandra Dick of the Herald…"
Main page link
Armand |
14Bore | 16 Feb 2024 5:01 p.m. PST |
Somehow doubt her skin tone would be anywhere near a shade darker than than Caucasian. Can suppose they have facial bone structure correct. |
Old Glory | 16 Feb 2024 5:17 p.m. PST |
Neat, but total conjecture. Russ Dunaway |
Editor in Chief Bill | 16 Feb 2024 6:55 p.m. PST |
Not total conjecture. The bones tell a lot. But there is artistic interpretation. |
Erzherzog Johann | 17 Feb 2024 2:23 a.m. PST |
I'm pretty sure DNA work on remains from that era do suggest that darker skin was most likely. Cheers, John |
Brennus | 17 Feb 2024 3:00 a.m. PST |
Fair skin tones arrived in Britain much later with the arrival of the beaker people. This has been confirmed by genetic analysis. |
FourDJones | 17 Feb 2024 5:55 a.m. PST |
Were things miserable in the Bronze Age? |
Frederick | 17 Feb 2024 11:12 a.m. PST |
She looks like the lady who lived in the flat next door when I was on a sabbatical in Edinburgh |
forrester | 17 Feb 2024 2:30 p.m. PST |
"Were things miserable in the Bronze Age?" Being buried for 4000 years doesn't do a lot for most people's tempers |
Tango01 | 17 Feb 2024 3:04 p.m. PST |
|
Zephyr1 | 17 Feb 2024 10:13 p.m. PST |
"Somehow doubt her skin tone would be anywhere near a shade darker than than Caucasian" Probably had a pretty good tan…? ;-) |
Druzhina | 18 Feb 2024 12:52 a.m. PST |
|
Cerdic | 18 Feb 2024 4:54 a.m. PST |
Zephyr1 – A tan? You've clearly never been to Scotland… Put her in jeans and a hoodie and she wouldn't look out of place walking down the street in Glasgow.
|
Dagwood | 18 Feb 2024 8:10 a.m. PST |
Cerdic – If the sun don't come you get your tan by standing in the Scottish rain. (After Lennon and McCartney) |
Tango01 | 18 Feb 2024 3:21 p.m. PST |
|
Tgunner | 29 Apr 2024 4:10 p.m. PST |
@Brennus- The article suggests that she was one of the Beaker People. "Archaeologists also found remnants of Beaker pottery in the woman's grave, indicating she may have been part of the Beaker culture, known for making pieces of distinctive pottery shaped like bells. This culture likely began in Central Europe before moving to present-day Britain around 2400 B.C.E. Beaker people quickly dominated, replacing the Neolithic communities and other groups living there. "The carbon dating suggests she might be a descendant of the first Beaker newcomers," Webb tells Live Science." |
Come In Nighthawk | 19 Jun 2024 2:20 p.m. PST |
Obvious, isn't it?? She was a woman from either the indigenous dark (or "darker") skinned "West European Hunter Gatherer," or equally darker-skinned "West European Farmer" culture, who was "taken" by (or if lucky, "married in to") a clan of in-coming "Beaker Culture" people. That easily explains the otherwise contradictory evidence of: a) DNA suggesting the reconstruction; b) the assemblage of pottery… |