Help support TMP


"The lone tank against the bad guys" Topic


13 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land
World War Two at Sea
World War Two in the Air

Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Profile Article


693 hits since 1 Dec 2023
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP01 Dec 2023 10:09 a.m. PST

A lone-tank crew faces a horde of German infantry (lacking any armour mind you) who plan a war winning flank attack. The crew must decide whether to stick with the sergeant commanding the tank or flee. Brief exchange of views, but all stay on and most are killed, but not in vain.

Sound familiar?

Humphrey Bogart in North Africa with an M3 General Lee in 1942. The film? "Sahara" which was televised during the week. Not seen it in at least 40 years but I was so struck by the storyline, exactly as in "Fury"

We all know there were some anachronisms and dubious tactics in "Fury" but the first 2/3 of the film I found very entertaining and gripping at times. The closing battle I thought insane, especially in mid 1945, but Humphrey's Stand made much more sense (and, for its time, quite a remarkable film)

Shagnasty Supporting Member of TMP01 Dec 2023 11:05 a.m. PST

Agreed! This is one of my favorite WW II films. I loved "Lulu Belle!"

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP01 Dec 2023 12:24 p.m. PST

Agreed! Not a movie you hear much about, but a very good one

Personal logo The Virtual Armchair General Sponsoring Member of TMP01 Dec 2023 1:25 p.m. PST

Yes, one of my favorite wartime films, too.

I understand it was based on a recently released Russian film that had the same story line, only presumably not in a desert setting!

TVAG

BuckeyeBob01 Dec 2023 3:21 p.m. PST

It also spoke to the allies working together in order to win the war. Besides the 3 U.S. crew, it had 3 Brits, a South African, and a "Frenchie". The Italian represents that nation's change over from Axis to Allied. Excellent 1943 film

Personal logo Artilleryman Supporting Member of TMP01 Dec 2023 8:26 p.m. PST

It was remade years later with Jim Belushi. I was not half as good.

mjkerner02 Dec 2023 8:04 p.m. PST

I feel the same as deadhead. First 2/3rds I watch and rewatch a lot. Great tank /infantry battles. I even liked the Battle vs the Tiger, if only for the ricochets and "head" shots, etc. I recommend the extended scene DVD. They're not put in the film (dang!), but are viewable as individual scenes. One especially goes a long way toward explaining why Wardaddy is the way he is.

Personal logo Artilleryman Supporting Member of TMP02 Dec 2023 8:20 p.m. PST

Yes. Fury. It started so well and then that end battle. I mean, everything was far too close together tactically but I can forgive that from a cinematic point of view. However, I still do not understand how two Hitlerjugend can take on five fully operational tanks and knock one out while an entire Waffen SS battlegroup cannot knock out one immobile tank. Even though they hit it a number of times with Panzerfausts they are never as effective as the one fired by the teenagers. (Strangely when we first see the SS it seems that every third one has a Panzerfaust but that number dwindles away when they have to use them.) Also, instead of a mad charge to their right into the open ground, why didn't they go to left and stalk Fury using the hedgerow. I could go on …

I am sure that there was a better way to end the film and still be as poignant. (Either way it was better than 'Napoleon'.)

Personal logo Mserafin Supporting Member of TMP04 Dec 2023 12:23 p.m. PST

Strangely when we first see the SS it seems that every third one has a Panzerfaust but that number dwindles away when they have to use them.

I always found that odd, as well, although defective Panzerfausts may have been an actual problem at the end of the war, I don't actually know. In addition, didn't the SS have a 1/2 track when first spotted, but that was down-graded to a truck for the final battle?

Personal logo Artilleryman Supporting Member of TMP04 Dec 2023 1:48 p.m. PST

You are right Mserafin. The half track is there all right with a truck, but we do not see it during the fight. Mind you, I am not sure it could have helped as it was not the version with a PAK. I suppose it could also have played at 'run in front of the enemy tank and see who makes it' which seems to have been the SS tactics.

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP05 Dec 2023 1:26 p.m. PST

I will never criticise a film for inaccuracies again after watching "Napoleon". I always put S. Bondarchuk in the lowest bowels of Dante's Hell for wasting the facilities he was granted, as a director, in 1970 making "Waterloo".

I had forgotten how ineffective proved the panzerfausts in the final sequence of "Fury". Indeed, what it took to kill Brad Pitt. At least two sniper hits, a turret penetration, was there a couple of grenades also, but he can still speak and tell the young lad how to escape?

Personal logo Artilleryman Supporting Member of TMP05 Dec 2023 6:53 p.m. PST

Brad's a hero …

mghFond09 Dec 2023 10:09 p.m. PST

Though normally not a Brad Pitt fan, I have to admit, I enjoyed Fury when a few of us saw it at the theatre. But then I realize you don't watch war movies for realism.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.