Help support TMP


"Best Invention or Innovation Under Napoleon Is..." Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

GallopingJack Checks Out The Terrain Mat

Mal Wright Fezian goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.


Featured Profile Article


Featured Book Review


826 hits since 28 Dec 2022
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian28 Dec 2022 9:44 p.m. PST

You were asked – TMP link

During his time in history, there are things attributed to Napoleon or his policies. What had the largest impact?

In the final round of voting:

46% said "Code Napoleon"
14% said "canning"
11% [TIE] said "army organization" OR "Louisiana Purchase"

Erzherzog Johann28 Dec 2022 9:51 p.m. PST

Surely the Louisiana Purchase has had the most impact on world history, since without it, the United States would be a very different entity and 19th and 20th century history would have taken a very different course.

Whether or not that equates to "Best", let alone "Invention or Innovation" is another matter.

Cheers,
John

Personal logo Old Contemptible Supporting Member of TMP01 Jan 2023 11:23 p.m. PST

The Rosetta Stone and the Louisiana Purchase are neither an invention nor an innovation.

4th Cuirassier03 Jan 2023 6:15 a.m. PST

Kinda says it all that one of the top three candidates is something Napoleon did that benefited someone else rather than France.

Incidentally, I have always wondered whether the USA was ripped off when it bought Louisiana. By 1811 Britain had captured every overseas possession of France and France's allies (according to Roger Knight in 'Britain Against Napoleon'). Why wouldn't Britain have captured Louisiana too, had it still been French? Was Napoleon selling something he was sure to lose anyway?

Personal logo miniMo Supporting Member of TMP03 Jan 2023 10:35 a.m. PST

The Louisiana Purchase led directly to the Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears, so not beneficial all around.

4th Cuirassier03 Jan 2023 12:17 p.m. PST

What is interesting is that he only bought it from Spain in 1801 and flipped it for a profit 2 years later. I wonder why Spain didn't just flog it to the USA?

wtjcom03 Jan 2023 8:10 p.m. PST

According to the Andrew Roberts book, Napoleon felt he was bound to lose the territory to the British and he was also souring on the general idea of trying to control distant colonies. He is also quoted as saying "I have just given to England a maritime rival that sooner or later will humble her pride."

When George Washington had died several years before, there was 10 days (?) of mourning declared by then First Consul Bonaparte. Selling Louisiana to the Americans would seem to have been preferable to many other options at the time. In any case, it was a pretty big kick of the course of history in a new direction.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.