"Don't Absorb the Marines" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article These "puzzle tanks" are good quality for the cost.
Featured Profile Article
Featured Movie Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
 Editor in Chief Bill   | 26 Sep 2022 2:26 a.m. PST |
You were asked – TMP link Does the United States need a light infantry force specializing in amphibious operations as a separate service? 77% said "keep the Marine Corps as it is now"
10% said "absorb the Marine Corps into the Army and Navy"
3% said "take away Marine aviation, leave Marines otherwise the same" |
 Legion 4   | 26 Sep 2022 9:58 a.m. PST |
Yes, keep the Corps as is … Well trained Infantry like the USMC, the Army's RANGERs, SF, 82d, 173d, 11th, 101, 10th MTN, etc. still have many uses, regardless. |
| Uesugi Kenshin | 26 Sep 2022 2:46 p.m. PST |
Definitely modernize the Corps. |
| Legion 4 | 26 Sep 2022 6:10 p.m. PST |
IIRC they are doing that, e.g. new Amphtracks for one. |
| Legion 4 | 27 Sep 2022 10:34 a.m. PST |
|
|
