Help support TMP


"Brevets in WWII?" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Hellcats of the Editor

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian tackles his greatest foe - another Green Vehicle...


Featured Workbench Article

15mm Base Contouring Round-Up: Four Materials

Can any of these products cure the dreaded "wedding cake" effect?


Featured Profile Article

First Look: 1:100 Grenadier Company

What's in the Grenadier Company set, revised as part of the D-Day releases from Battlefront?


Current Poll


695 hits since 24 Jun 2022
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Korvessa24 Jun 2022 9:35 a.m. PST

Reading a book on the Italian campaign and on a couple of occasions it mentions generals either having or getting busted to a lower rank.
Was that a thing in WWII?
I knew it happened a lot pre-WWI (General Custer being a Lt Col for example) – but hadn't heard about it in WWII before.

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP24 Jun 2022 10:21 a.m. PST

I don't understand what you are asking. Reduction in a permanent rank to a lesser permanent rank, or a reduction from their brevet to their permanent rank, or something else?

Korvessa24 Jun 2022 10:44 a.m. PST

Sorry
Reduced from general "to permanent rank" of colonel was one example. Which sounded like a brevet to me, though the author never used that word.

Personal logo ColCampbell Supporting Member of TMP24 Jun 2022 11:07 a.m. PST

At the time there were "two" armies -- the Regular Army (RA) and the Army of the United States (AUS). An officer could hold rank in both "armies" with his RA rank being less than his AUS rank. When senior officers were "reduced" in rank that normally meant that they went from a higher AUS rank to the lower RA rank. This was not the same as a brevet rank in the 19th century since RA officers holding a higher AUS rank also got paid at the AUS rank level.

When I was commissioned in the Regular Army in 1973, I held both RA and AUS ranks and continued to do so until I retired. That dual distinction was done away with sometime in the later 1990s, I think.

Jim

HMS Exeter24 Jun 2022 11:08 a.m. PST

During WWII, the rapid expansion of the US military necessitated the rapid promotion of officers to comparatively lofty heights to staff and command the large expeditionary forces.

Officers sent overseas often had a permanent rank and a "theater rank." The theater rank might be several grades higher than their permanent rank. If, for whatever reason, someone were sent back to the US, their theater rank was suspended. They were not demoted, per se. They lost their theater rank, and resumed their permanent rank.

Korvessa24 Jun 2022 1:14 p.m. PST

Jim
When I was in the USAR in the mid-80s, there was some talk about the different commissions between:
USMA
ROTC (me)
California Military Academy

With USMA & ROTC being "Federal Commissions" & CMA being a "State Commission" (although I knew a couple of CMA grads who were officers in USAR not CNG).

I never bothered to find out what the exact difference was though.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.