Help support TMP


"Ru. Leib-Garde Chevalier" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Media Message Board


Action Log

20 Jan 2022 6:45 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Changed title from "Ru. Lieb-Garde Chevalier" to "Ru. Leib-Garde Chevalier"

Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

De Bellis Antiquitatis (DBA)


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:700 Black Seas British Brigs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints brigs for the British fleet.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: 1:700 Scale USS Constitution

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks at the new U.S.S. Constitution for Black Seas.


Featured Book Review


746 hits since 20 Jan 2022
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
SHaT198420 Jan 2022 3:18 p.m. PST

I see the T. man has posted site that I'd been trawling a few times so he must be hacking my trails…

Presentation of the Garde
.

Anyway, here's a Russian perspective on this regiment and its infamous beginnings. If you think the current Brits royal family is misshapen, they have nothing on the Romanovs ancestors!

Lieb-Garde Chevalier.

#6 'first mentioned' is an intriguing chapter!

regds
davew
≠ ≠

SHaT198420 Jan 2022 7:52 p.m. PST

And because this thread TMP link in its' mired language difficulties, actually has Leib-Garde Chevalier standards that may or may not coincide with the premium article I referenced above.

Worth a look Boris anyway…
cheers
d
*Apologies for silly spelling error___

SHaT198428 Jan 2022 5:57 p.m. PST

And a missive on the Ulan Tsesarevich Konstantin (Konstatine Uhlans):

link

It seems (written/published in 1875 journal) Konstantine had a drive to get them launched [ggl transl.]:

With fiery love, the Tsarevich took up the formation of his regiment, and on purpose several times this year he came to Makhnovka in order to personally follow the progress of the case. From St. Petersburg, he sent here a lot of different artisans, and some tailors and cutters were even ordered from Austria. The Grand Duke wanted the regiment – his dream, his creation – to be equipped in the most foppish way.

cheers d

SHaT198422 Feb 2022 3:16 p.m. PST

link

"ARMY OF ALEXANDER I by JOHN SLOAN"

In reciting Viskovatov, this site does a disservice to modern readers, as it fails to highlight that 'documenting' regulations, while worthy of itself, doesn't mean that [what is illustrated] is what troops actually wore [on campaigns].

Thus the illustrations are indicative only, and dates should be taken with a curious endeavour to validate them. For instance, the imperial 'Garde' infantry regiments had the Potemkin style full dress expunged (or at least not seen outside St. Petersburg palaces); in 1805 ALL Garde infantry wore the cylindrical shako*. See elsewhere on forum.

cheers d

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.