"Khurasan vs. Essex T'ang Chinese" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Classical Asian Warfare Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients Medieval Renaissance
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile ArticleIf you were a kid in the 1960s who loved history and toy soldiers, you probably had a WOW figure!
Featured Movie Review
|
jeeves | 24 Dec 2021 3:03 p.m. PST |
Does anyone have a preference between these two lines? I'm looking at the photos online and they seem very much on par. Thanks in advance. |
JAFD26 | 25 Dec 2021 3:09 p.m. PST |
Would also take a look at the Outpost line outpostwargameservices.co.uk Am now about half-finished painting up Tang army of their figures, may post some photos here if you want |
jeeves | 26 Dec 2021 9:09 a.m. PST |
Sure that would be great. Forgot about those. |
Redcurrant | 27 Dec 2021 12:41 p.m. PST |
I have 2 Tang Chinese armies. My Early Tang is made by Outpost Wargames. I like their infantry as the shields are well proportioned, and their cavalry is really nicely positioned and functional. Their Crossbow artillary are exquisite. My Later Tang is made by Khurasan. Their cavalry are beautiful, although their infantry do look to have shields that are a bit too small. The Khurasan infantry can either have bow and spear, or spear. |
|