Help support TMP


"Tzar tank" Topic


14 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Early 20th Century Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War One

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Royal Artillery OQF 18 Pdr Field Battery

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian gets started with WWI British in 15mm.


Featured Workbench Article

Painting the Japanese Patrol Aeronef Moni

The painting of the Aeronef Moni.


Featured Profile Article

Other Games at Council of Five Nations 2011

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian snapped some photos of games he didn't get a chance to play in at Council of Five Nations.


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


1,026 hits since 13 Dec 2021
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Barin113 Dec 2021 6:27 a.m. PST

I didn't know that Lebedenko's tank was reproduced and wasn't quite aware on the scale of the monster.
There's a replica in T-34 museum near Moscow, I was there many years ago but it wasn't there back then.
museum-t-34.ru/eng
link
link

Oddball13 Dec 2021 6:42 a.m. PST

That is great!

I am very sorry I missed this museum when I was in Moscow in 2007. Looks like it would have been fun trip.

I like the idea of live firing the weapons from the photo gallery. Not something that would be allowed in the US.

Personal logo Dan Cyr Supporting Member of TMP13 Dec 2021 9:06 a.m. PST

It is huge. I've 3D printed it in 1/144 scale for an imaginary WWI game where all the nations that produced or designed "monster" tanks for the war or 1919 are on the table. Able to 3D print ones for the US , UK Flying Elephant, French Char 2C, Italian Fiat 2000, German K-Wagon and Russian Tzar and Mendeleev Rybinsk. Most not really practical, but impressive looking.

Eumelus Supporting Member of TMP13 Dec 2021 10:25 a.m. PST

While this beast is loads of fun to imagine in a VSF context, the fact that it somehow got past the sketchpad stage in real life is bizarre to me. Whatever its offensive potential, and not even considering whatever vulnerability to enemy action it might have, it is obviously going to be stopped by the first river it encounters – very few Russian, Polish, or eastern German bridges would have been wide enough at this time for it. Nor is it railroad-transportable, unless disassembled somehow.

Barin113 Dec 2021 11:31 a.m. PST

One of the recently popular theories is that it was an enemy diversion to relocate much needed financing from real stuff ;)

It is like a bicycle with armored driver and so impractical and so unlike robust fool-proof typical Russian engineering design that this theory even might be true.
It was supposed to be powered by 2 Maybach engines while we were at war with Germany.
The story mentions that the emperor was very impressed with the model, but still somehow the inventor have received the audience with monarch in the first place…

thosmoss13 Dec 2021 11:45 a.m. PST

I'd want to fire a round of chain shot at those back wheels. Did anybody bring any chain shot?

Cardinal Ximenez13 Dec 2021 12:48 p.m. PST

Not something that would be allowed in the US.

Not at a museum but you can in Las Vegas. ;)

dBerczerk13 Dec 2021 4:13 p.m. PST

I had thought the large wheels were at the front of the tank and the smaller roller was the tail end.

Personal logo Dan Cyr Supporting Member of TMP13 Dec 2021 9:30 p.m. PST

dBerczerk, you are correct.

Griefbringer15 Dec 2021 12:48 p.m. PST

The story mentions that the emperor was very impressed with the model, but still somehow the inventor have received the audience with monarch in the first place…

This story might tell more about the judgment of Nikolai II than the merits of the vehicle design in question.

That said, this being early 1915, any vehicular design with cross-country potential might have been of interest – the tracked tanks were still something unknown to the world.

Personal logo Dan Cyr Supporting Member of TMP15 Dec 2021 9:05 p.m. PST

The problem with it was an incorrect balance of weight in the design. It rolled OK until it rolled onto soft ground where the rear wheels sank in and the vehicle could not be moved or retrieved.

Barin116 Dec 2021 2:48 a.m. PST

Last summer there was an expedition to the forest, where the machine was assembled,they have used drones to look for tracks, as they thought they were deep enough to still be traceable. They have found a couple of kilometers of old tracks, so it moved during the trials…but just a bit. Probably it could work on a frozen ground without snow…but there's too many limitations for the machine which was supposed to be a breakthrough.

Griefbringer16 Dec 2021 1:02 p.m. PST

Must have been quite some tracks left, if they can still be detected after a century.

Regarding soft terrain, the ground pressure might have been quite significant, especialyl on that rear wheel.

Barin117 Dec 2021 2:17 a.m. PST

Can't find the last year expedition page, but got the one of 2015.
They say the tracks are still 30 cm deep, so I guess they could have been like 50-60 cm originally, so no wonder it couldn't move on wet terrain.
t-444.ru/g17a.html
While looking for expedition info I've found a report by Red Army inspection which was a death sentence to machine. Basically it says the same as we have discussed here – vulnerable, engines not powerful enough, only a few bridges can withstand the weight, boiler steel instead of real armour.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.