Help support TMP


"Rodney & the Breaking of the Line - Peter Trew" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the 18th Century Media Message Board

Back to the Age of Sail Message Board


Areas of Interest

Renaissance
18th Century
Napoleonic
19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Rank & File


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

The Amazing Worlds of Grenadier

The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.


Featured Profile Article

Other Games at Council of Five Nations 2011

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian snapped some photos of games he didn't get a chance to play in at Council of Five Nations.


Featured Book Review


1,300 hits since 29 Apr 2021
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Zardoz

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
carojon29 Apr 2021 1:10 a.m. PST

I've recently finished Peter Trew's account of one of the most famous and great British admirals, Lord George Brydges Rodney, 1st Baron Rodney, who broke the stale line versus line tactics with his famous manoeuvre at the Battle of the Saintes 12th April 1782, that would later influence British battle tactics in the glory years of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars.

picture

However there is more to the man that the Battle of the Saintes and I found Trew's account a very readable and informing one.

If you would like to know more then just follow the link to JJ's

link

JJ

Dave Jackson Supporting Member of TMP29 Apr 2021 5:05 a.m. PST

Have it and agree with your assessment

carojon30 Apr 2021 2:11 a.m. PST

Hi,
Great, and thanks for your comment.
JJ

Blutarski30 Apr 2021 3:30 p.m. PST

" ….. there is more to the man that the Battle of the Saintes." Indeed. The looting of Sait Eustatius for one thing ;-)

B

carojon01 May 2021 1:47 a.m. PST

Well I think a fair reading of the situation is that St Eustatius was a case of six of one and half a dozen of the other in that the island was clearly and blatantly involved in supplying contraband to British enemies in contemptuous breach of its neutrality status with some British merchants involved in the trade and joining in making the huge profits such illegal acts enjoyed.

It is somewhat surprising that the British did not go in there earlier with such outrageous activity going on and a charitable view would be to give the British government acknowledgement for at least following the accepted legal formality of waiting until war existed between Holland and Great Britain before they did, which explains but doesn't excuse the frustration vented on the island once it was moved against.

As pointed out in the review Rodney had been on the receiving end of that illegal trade after French ships that had been in battle with Rodney's fleet off Martinique refitted using materials supplied by the island which must have caused much anger at such behaviour in time of war.

Against those facts there is evidence that personal possessions of islanders were illegally confiscated along with clearly obvious materials that were contraband and the fact that the British government did not send out independent legally trained administrators to oversee the confiscations left the military leadership in an invidious position to be called out for personal self enrichment.

All this is covered in a balanced way by Trew as mentioned in the review. Plus Rodney was held accountable in the British courts long after the war by merchants able to submit claims against him and where his position was clearly scrutinised which can't always be said for a lot of other national legal systems at the time, holding their military and political leaders to account.

Personally I think the greater fault that Rodney committed was his abdicating his command of the fleet to Hood whilst he busied himself overseeing the confiscation work instead of delegating it to a junior officer and fulfilling his primary duty of taking the war to the French fleet in the region, which would have also helped to deflect later charges of his own personal self enrichment.

Interestingly, Rodney clearly failed at self enrichment, as the French intercepted the convoy carrying the confiscated materials back to the UK but I am not aware that they returned them to their Dutch allies or contented themselves with ‘looting' them instead. Either way it seems likely that there was no possible route for compensation in the French courts.

As often these situations are often shades of grey rather than black and white.

Thanks for the comment and I hope you enjoy the book.

JJ

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.