"A(nother) New Afghanistan Strategy, Based on an Old Approach" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench ArticleWith clean lines and not a lot of clutter, Minidragon says these figures are a painter's dream!
Featured Profile Article
Featured Movie Review
|
Tango01 | 21 Dec 2020 9:47 p.m. PST |
"A previous article asked some critical questions about the current U.S. strategy for Afghanistan.[1] Some of the questions that are still worth asking – and answering – include the following: Is pride an appropriate national interest? No – but it is an unavoidable one and will always be considered. To what degree should past efforts be relevant in crafting a new strategy? Past efforts should not be central in crafting a new strategy; however, they do require addressing, if for no other reason than to garner support for the new strategy…" Main page link Amicalement Armand |
Legion 4 | 23 Dec 2020 9:44 a.m. PST |
Short of fencing in the whole place in and cutting off all forms of aid and support from everywhere. I see no reason to have a new US Strategy there. You can put lipstick on a pig … but it still is a pig … |
Tango01 | 24 Dec 2020 1:05 p.m. PST |
|
|