Help support TMP


"Waterloo Weapons and Tactics" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board

Back to the Firearms Message Board


Areas of Interest

Renaissance
18th Century
Napoleonic
American Civil War
19th Century
World War One
World War Two on the Land
Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

More 15mm Boxers from Cellmate

Tod gives us another look at his "old school" Boxer Rebellion figures.


Featured Book Review


1,314 hits since 28 Nov 2020
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0128 Nov 2020 4:22 p.m. PST

"It is necessary to understand the weaponry available to the Napoleonic soldier and the tactics enforced on them by the limitations of these weapons before one can fully understand the options available to a general, fighting a battle in the era of Waterloo. The branches of service in an army of this period would not be unknown to a modern soldier in many respects, the three main arms available being the foot soldier, the horseman or cavalryman whose modern equivalent drives a tank and the artillery; with specialist units attached in support roles, such as Staff troops for communication and clerical duties, supplies, engineers and medical personnel. Clearly the capabilities of each branch were in their infancy in relation to the technical abilities of modern army units.

However, the basic organisational tree of the modern army is also quite similar, indeed the idea of a corps being a semi autonomous all arms unit that can function independently in all respects as a mini army was developed during the Napoleonic wars. The rank structure of individuals within the modern army and the company/battalion/regiment/brigade/division/corps structure is little different from that utilised during these wars. The difference only becomes marked when one considers the uniforms, the limitations of the weapons and the battlefield tactics imposed upon the troops by their weaponry…"
Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

4th Cuirassier28 Nov 2020 6:05 p.m. PST

You know when you've been Tangoed.

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP29 Nov 2020 4:42 a.m. PST

Which I think is present perfect passive tense of the verb to Tango. The act might be Tangation?

Having been Tangoed is reasonable I think when he leads us to sites we may have missed. It is even better when the various Boards do get a bit quiet.

OK. The annoyance might come when one's own posting is then repeated a few days later, as something new. But by then one's original work is sliding down the table anyway. I used to say he produced a 60/40 split of rubbish and wonders. I have progressively altered my score to about 30/70 now.

Tango0129 Nov 2020 3:37 p.m. PST

(smile)

Amicalement
Armand

4th Cuirassier29 Nov 2020 5:30 p.m. PST

Glad you like them boys! (smile)

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP30 Nov 2020 3:21 a.m. PST

Nice one. I like that……….

Tango0130 Nov 2020 12:45 p.m. PST

(smile)

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.