Help support TMP


"Why ancient Rome kept choosing bizarre and perverted" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Impetus


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

The Amazing Worlds of Grenadier

The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.


Featured Workbench Article

The Alpha 54mm Painting Contest

Five finalists are in the painting rounds of the Alpha 54mm Painting Contest (sponsored by Alpha Miniatures). Who will prove themselves masters of painting 54mm scale Ancients?


Featured Profile Article

The Simtac Tour

The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.


Current Poll


1,403 hits since 13 Nov 2020
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0113 Nov 2020 9:50 p.m. PST

…Emperors

"Some of the most famous Roman emperors were perverted, megalomaniacal, or just plain crazy. The weird fixations of Caligula and Nero made them household names.

But these stories have always raised a difficult question: If these emperors were really so deranged, how did they become leaders of one of the greatest empires the world has ever known?

To sort it out, I spoke with two historians: Clifford Ando, a professor of classics and author of Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire, and Anthony Barrett, a professor of classics and author of Lives of the Caesars…"
Main page

link

Amicalement
Armand

Puster Sponsoring Member of TMP14 Nov 2020 12:46 a.m. PST

Looking at some of the world leaders today – many of them elected, some less so – the wonder of "how could the Romans" is transformed into "do we ever learn".

GildasFacit Sponsoring Member of TMP14 Nov 2020 5:18 a.m. PST

Romans rarely chose an emperor, it wasn't a democracy.

A few powerful generals tended to be the ideal companions to get the job until the generals started wanting the job too.

DrSkull14 Nov 2020 8:40 a.m. PST

There's something missing in the analysis. All those listed inherited the throne when they were young. Gaining absolute power at a youngish age without earning it through one's own efforts encourages bad behavior. The competent emperors all had careers of their own before becoming emperor or had to struggle to gain the throne.

Tango0114 Nov 2020 11:51 a.m. PST

(smile)


Amicalement
Armand

Perris070714 Nov 2020 12:04 p.m. PST

Dr Skull has a great point. Only Caracalla does not fit the mold.

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP14 Nov 2020 5:10 p.m. PST

True – both Nero and Caligula were pretty early in the Empire's history; plus as noted Nero wasn't so bad overall

Tango0115 Nov 2020 3:37 p.m. PST

Nero…at the beginning…

Amicalement
Armand

saltflats192915 Nov 2020 9:21 p.m. PST

SpQ-anon

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.