Help support TMP


"The US Navy’s Next Large Surface Combatant" Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Naval Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Showcase Article

20mm U.S. Army Specialists, Episode 2

Can you identify the specialist?


Featured Workbench Article

Deep Dream: Women Warriors

What happens when AI generates Women Warriors?


Featured Profile Article


Featured Book Review


812 hits since 30 Oct 2020
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0130 Oct 2020 9:51 p.m. PST

"What will the U.S. Navy's next large surface combatant look like?

The USN has cycled through a wide variety of plans for its next generation large surface combatant, including both cruiser and destroyer projects. Thus far, three decades of thinking about replacing the Ticonderogas and the DDG-51 classes have resulted in the Zumwalts, a three ship class widely regarded as expensive curiosities, and a third flight of Arleigh Burke destroyers. According to David Larter, the Navy is now looking at entirely new hull that would represent a step beyond the DDG-51 in terms of size and capability. It is quite likely that the new ships will be equipped to carry and launch hypersonic weapons from construction.

The Navy's future cruiser project also remains up in the air, but the ships will also require a larger hull. It is not inconceivable that the Navy could use the same hull for both the future cruisers and destroyers, with different constellations of systems to fulfill the missions specific to each type. The Ticonderoga class cruisers, after all, were based on the hull of the Spruance class destroyers. Larter's reporting suggests that the Navy is focusing on a hull that can accommodate a set of already-developed technologies better than the existing DDG-51, which does not allow much room for growth. New technologies could then be incorporated into destroyers and cruisers as they develop into maturity…"
Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

arealdeadone16 Nov 2020 4:24 p.m. PST

Given USN's performance in ship design, I have no confidence this class of ship will be a.) capable, b.) on time, c.) on budget and d.) delivered in meaningful numbers.

Tango0116 Nov 2020 10:28 p.m. PST

Glup!…


Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.