Help support TMP


"How Should The Pentagon Defend Its Base At Guam..." Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

15mm Trucks From Hell

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian struggles to complete his SISI truck force.


Featured Profile Article


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


898 hits since 23 Jul 2020
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0123 Jul 2020 8:33 p.m. PST

…From Chinese Missiles?

"The U.S. Navy admiral in charge of Indo-Pacific Command is worried about Guam.

In the event of war, the Chinese military could target the U.S. island territory with cruise and ballistic missiles, Adm. Phil Davidson warned. And that could remove from the map the U.S. Air Force's main Pacific base for bombers and other heavy warplanes.

The solution, Davidson said, is to install the Aegis missile-defense system on Guam. Aegis Ashore could function as "the backbone of [a] homeland defense system" for the territory, Davidson told reporters on Wednesday…"

picture


Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

Walking Sailor23 Jul 2020 9:22 p.m. PST

Last night, late night radio, so it would be The John Batchelor Show wmal.com/john-batchelor , but late enough that I don't remember who he had on; they talked about Wake Island. Out of range of China, but it can hit Guam to support a retaking.

Uparmored24 Jul 2020 5:33 a.m. PST

thanks for the link to John Batcherlor, as a bachelor myself, I'll check it out.

Uparmored24 Jul 2020 9:13 p.m. PST

Wow, good call on Batchtelor, I'm now a fan of his podcast.

Thresher0125 Jul 2020 1:00 p.m. PST

The nuclear umbrella has worked well for a very long time, so could be applied here as well.

arealdeadone26 Jul 2020 6:54 p.m. PST

Thresher,

Problem with nukes is that I don't think the US will use nukes to protect it lest it trigger a nuclear exchange against continental America.

Out of range of China, but it can hit Guam to support a retaking.

I don't think there's any current threat of China taking Guam as it's navy still lacks expeditionary capability. Even if it had a super carrier fleet that was bigger and more capable than the US it would still have to run a gauntlet in the open Pacific.

Chinese advantage is in the seas around mainland China:

a.) These seas are surrounded by large islands and thus represent a choke point that curtails US sorties within (but also prevents China getting out).
b.) These seas allow best concentration of Chinese power and can be supported by land based missile and aircraft systems,
c.) These seas are major trade routes. Chinese control of them shuts down a lot of the Asia Pacific.


No doubt Guam could be peppered with missiles and thus neutralised even if only for a short period of time. But I doubt the Chinese would ever be able to take it in the next few decades.


The Japanese were in many ways in a better position in terms of Pacific military action as they had direct and unrestricted access to the Pacific which the Chinese don't.

Thresher0126 Jul 2020 10:14 p.m. PST

You could be right, but the nuclear threat has kept the peace for the last 75 years, so it shouldn't be off the table.

I can see them lobbing missiles at Guam, if things get hot, in order to reduce or eliminate it as a US base of operations, which is when we should lob some back – nuclear tipped, or not.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.