"The Combat of the Thirty" Topic

"Many people with an interest in war in the Middle Ages succumb to the temptation to confuse the reality of how it was with a romantic ideal of the spectacle of knights in battle. Of course, it was sometimes possible that wars were quickly decided by such dramatic combat, but if they dragged on, which they normally did, battles and even sieges became rare exceptions. Instead the fighting devolved into raids, ambushes, devastation and looting. Such tactics allowed fighting to continue by providing funding for troops, while simultaneously depleting the enemy's financial resources. No wonder then that these armies quickly mutated into little more than bands of robbers. Chivalry – at least in the modern understanding – was mainly conspicuous by its absence. These "knights" were often too busy collecting ransom money to go out and loot, torture prisoners or extort the last piece of bread from starving peasants.

Like shining beacons the spectacular English victories of Crecy (1346) and Maupertuis (1356) lit up the first phase of the Hundred Years' War. But what happened in between? While there was no pause in the fighting, one gets the impression that events became obscured in the darkness between the blaze of these two battles. Looking for more specific information, you may stumble upon – in a very remote corner – the war in Brittany. There, after the death of the old Duke in 1341, fighting broke out between two noble factions over the succession in the duchy. One group had formed around Charles of Blois, the husband of the niece of the Duke. Because Charles of Blois was approved by the French king, it was only natural that the English supported his competitor, John of Montfort, the step-brother of the old Duke…"
Main page

link

Amicalement
Armand