Help support TMP


"Youngest American soldier [a marine] killed in Vietnam" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Vietnam War Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Amazon's Bad Kids

At Christmas, the good kids get presents. Ever wondered what happened to the bad kids?


Featured Workbench Article

Maddogs and Englishmen...

Lonewolf dcc Fezian paints his favorite from Hasslefree's Zombie Hunter range.


Current Poll


496 hits since 17 Jun 2020
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Skarper17 Jun 2020 11:06 a.m. PST

link

This was just over 51 years ago. He was 15.

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP17 Jun 2020 12:58 p.m. PST

He was born two months after me. I have lived a full life (and then some) ever since. Bless him.

Why was his burial site not better marked e.g. Arlington or home? Surely that was one thing the US was great at, getting the bodies off the field, getting them home, ensuring identification and proper military burial. Or at least so I thought.

As for treating their surviving veterans…

Skarper17 Jun 2020 1:39 p.m. PST

It seems if buried in a normal cemetery the costs are not fully covered. They provide the headstone, but not the cost of 'setting' it. This is from what the current rules are. May well have been different 50+ years ago.

Perhaps it was money. Bullock's family were far from wealthy.

Such a sad story.

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP18 Jun 2020 7:41 a.m. PST

Sad story, indeed.

I imagine his family claimed the body, and then did the best they could with limited means. The military does not pay for civilian funerals, nor do they automatically mark graves. You have to fill out paperwork to be buried in Arlington, and you have to fill out paperwork to get a stone, etc. The family might not have been aware of their options, or have the means or energy to pursue them. And, at the end of the day, they probably wanted their son to be buried at home, as most veterans are.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP21 Jun 2020 10:34 a.m. PST

Yes, very sad. But since then the military is better at taking care of the dead and their families. And even our Vets overall.

Certainly much better that WWII. E.g. those buried on Tarawa. A few weeks later the USN came in bulldozed over the graves. Built roads, runways, etc., turn the atoll into an airfield.

The US still is trying to dig up those buried there. And many other places during WWII as well as Korea. And SE Aisa of course.

One location in the PI. US POWs in IJF's hands that died/murdered were buried by other POWs. Later after the war, PI gov't buildings were built over the site/graves.

Recently a US Tm went into find those bodies. They ask the PI gov't if they could dig under the buildings. To find our dead. They said, "Yes, please, we see ghosts all the time here!" … huh?

True story from a recent issue of Military History magazine.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.