Help support TMP


"China's Rejection Of Arms Control Means A New Arms..." Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

A Fistful of TOWs


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Return of The Brigadier

More photographs of The Brigadier and his men.


Featured Profile Article

Checking Out a Boardgame, Episode II

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks for scenario material in a World War IV boardgame.


637 hits since 22 May 2020
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

The Membership System will be closing for maintenance in 14 minutes. Please finish anything that will involve the membership system, including membership changes or posting of messages.

Tango0122 May 2020 8:51 p.m. PST

…Race Is About to Happen

"By entering an arms control regime, China could show that it accepts the value of arms control and seeks confidence-building measures, which aids stability while demonstrating that China is a status quo power. The fact that China rejects arms control is troubling and suggests, first, it is a revisionist power, and second, that it wants to be unfettered as it expands its arsenal.

China's expansion of nuclear weapons has not received the attention it deserves due to its threat to U.S. interests and for strategic stability. China's actions undermine the ability of the United States to deter attacks against the United States, to extend deterrence to its allies, and to protect its interests. Strategic stability results when both or all sides in a deterrence relationship have little incentive to race for superiority. During the dénouement of the Cold War, strategic stability obtained for the United States and Russia. However, strategic stability will not obtain with respect to China for three reasons…"
Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

Garryowen Supporting Member of TMP23 May 2020 7:13 a.m. PST

You couldn't trust them in any arms deal anyway.

Tom

Tango0123 May 2020 12:11 p.m. PST

Glup!…


Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.