"This 300,000-year-old skull may be from an African" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Prehistoric Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench ArticleThe Army for Bill was a collective project in which TMP'ers came together to jointly paint an Ancients army for yours truly.
Featured Profile ArticleGet these inexpensive dinos while you can.
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 | 18 Apr 2020 11:58 a.m. PST |
… ‘ghost' population. "A mysterious but well-preserved hominid skull found nearly a century ago comes from a population that lived in Africa around 300,000 years ago, as the earliest Homo sapiens were evolving, a new study finds. This discovery indicates that a separate Homo population, perhaps a species some researchers call H. heidelbergensis (SN: 6/22/19), inhabited Africa at the same time as both H. sapiens and a recently discovered population dubbed H. naledi (SN: 6/10/17), say geochronologist Rainer Grün and his colleagues. African H. heidelbergensis could have been a recently reported "ghost population" (SN: 3/14/20) that interbred with ancient H. sapiens and passed a small amount of DNA to present-day West Africans, the researchers suggest April 1 in Nature…"
Main page link Amicalement Armand |
ochoin | 18 Apr 2020 5:15 p.m. PST |
Hybridisation within the Human species is the new 'hot' topic, made possible with DNA science. I believe there's an indication that H. Sapiens not only has Neanderthal & Denisovan admixtures but hints of a third, yet undiscovered, species. |
Dagwood | 19 Apr 2020 3:59 a.m. PST |
I was under the impression that at least part of the definition of "species" was that hybridisation resulted in infertile offspring. Does this make all the different human types members of the same species ? And how can you tell the difference between admixtures due to hybridisation and genes from some common ancestor |
Tango01 | 19 Apr 2020 3:43 p.m. PST |
Good questions…. Amicalement Armand |
|