Help support TMP


"6th April, seven hundred years ago..." Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Media Message Board

Back to the Medieval Media Message Board

Back to the Today in History Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
Medieval
Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

6mm Main Force Israeli Infantry

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian adds infantry to his Israeli force.


Featured Workbench Article

Back to Paper Modeling - with the Hoverfly

The Editor returns to paper modeling after a long absence.


Featured Profile Article

Editor Gwen Says Thanks

Personal logo Editor Gwen The Editor of TMP thanks you for your donations.


Featured Movie Review


837 hits since 5 Apr 2020
©1994-2021 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Robert le Diable06 Apr 2020 4:37 a.m. PST

the Scots nobles appended their seals to parchments asserting the right of their country to be free of the domination of another. The import of that declaration has been variously estimated by various authorities. Its importance as a historical document cannot be overlooked. Well, maybe that should read "ought not"; despite the efforts of several Scots to get some kind of TV documentary aired on this anniversary, the BBC has ignored these repeated approaches. Bring on another series about Queen Victoria and her heavy-jawed brood, about the unprincipled "Windsors", about Henry VIII again, about anything which can have a "re-make" slopped out for the Polloi. The North Britons here don't bother, but we Scots do. Pure ragin' so Ah'm urr.

advocate06 Apr 2020 5:06 a.m. PST

Read it in full, but I abbreviate: we are the Scots. We came over from Ireland and destroyed the Picts. And now we won't give it up…

Robert le Diable06 Apr 2020 5:34 a.m. PST

I would hold certain truths to be self-evident. But you have omitted one vital aspect of the D of A; in principle, a king's authority lasts only so long as he maintains the rights and well-being of the people. In response to the implied point about conquest and possession, the well-being of a realm definitely involves its being defended from foreign aggression.

Steamingdave206 Apr 2020 8:48 a.m. PST

@advocate. Scots destroyed the Picts. Don't think so. The first king of Scots was almost certainly a Pict himself, although raised in the Scots territory of Dal Riata. Picts ard alive and well in modern Scotland, but now they, the Angles, the Gaels, the Norse and the Strathclyde Britons are all "Scots".

Swampster07 Apr 2020 7:51 a.m. PST

@Steamingdave2 it isn't @advocate saying that, it is the declaration itself:
" Afterwards, coming from there, one thousand two hundred years from the Israelite people's crossing of the Red Sea, to its home in the west, which it now holds, having first thrown out the Britons and completely destroyed the Picts…"
"…expulsis primo Britonibus et Pictis omnino deletis…"

Whatever the actual history, that was the belief of the writers.

advocate07 Apr 2020 10:19 a.m. PST

Indeed, Swampster, that was my point.
Robert, the "Nationalist" take on the Declaration is all about defending independence, not about how they took it from others in the first place. My main point being that things just aren't as simple as people often make out.

Robert le Diable07 Apr 2020 2:43 p.m. PST

Yes, that's the reason for the hint conveyed by the "hold these truths…." phrase, the source of which must surely be recognised widely. It's evident that groups of people have been conquered or destroyed by other groups for as long as they could be called "people", or at least "hominids". Sometimes it's called things like "Manifest Destiny", "Progress","The March of Civilisation" or "The White Man's Burden". Further, it's often stated that concepts of Nationality are not as relevant to Mediaeval Europe as to Modern, a statement with which I would also agree (while nevertheless being aware from near-contemporary writings in Scotland that the concept is not at all irrelevant). Finally, the explicit characterisation of the relationship between a Monarch and the Realm which I indicated above is of such importance that it cannot legitimately be excluded from any worthwhile summary, or from any abbreviation which is other than a distortion. And the point about the BBC is significant too, in a more immediate context.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.