Help support TMP


"Books for Quarantine: Hugh White Suggests, Plus..." Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Utter Drivel Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Quickie Figs


Rating: gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Coverbinding at Staples

How does coverbinding work?


Featured Workbench Article

A Good-Looking Army in a Reasonable Amount of Time

Painting a wargaming army is a completely different beast from painting a single miniature for display.


Featured Profile Article

3DPrinting: Striations, Surfaces, Wisps & Fusing

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian discusses the limitations and challenges of working with a low-end 3Dprinter.


Featured Book Review


301 hits since 23 Mar 2020
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0123 Mar 2020 9:41 p.m. PST

…. a Time for Classics.

""Why did no one suggest The Decameron?" asks prominent Australian strategic analyst Hugh White in a quick email responding to the excellent collection of books The Interpreter readers offered as distractions for a time in Covid-19 quarantine. "Too obvious?"

Slightly awkwardly, I don't admit to White that I have no idea what he's referring to, but instead shoot him back a message asking for a line to recommend why other people should read it…."
Main page

link


Amicalement
Armand

Robert le Diable24 Mar 2020 3:31 p.m. PST

Ha! The Decameron is the obvious, Bleeped text choice (but you'll have to be careful what English translation you get, unless you can understand Italian). I've always liked Mark Twain's observation that, "a Classic is a book everyone wants to have read – but no-one really wants to read".

Robert le Diable24 Mar 2020 7:44 p.m. PST

Sorry for that two-word expression, which I really thought quite innocuous. It just meant "know-all", a noticeably smart person.

Tango0125 Mar 2020 12:01 p.m. PST

(smile)

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.